W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > November 2018

Clarifications: Call for adoption - WEBRTC-QUIC

From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 13:35:13 +0100
To: public-webrtc@w3.org
Message-ID: <98ea17a2-cf6c-c001-331b-47f0760c8019@alvestrand.no>
When tallying the arguments and positions for or against adoption, I was
unable to determine clearly the position of the following people who
have participated in the thread:

- Youenn Fablet
- Cullen Jennings
- Sergio Garcia Murillo
- Lennart Grahl
- Alexey Aylarov
- Roman Shpout

I could make guesses based on commentary, but that would be guesswork;
it would be better if the people themselves were to say "Favors
adoption", "Against adoption", or "Does not wish to be counted".

I also note that in Lyon there were ~10 people supporting adoption; so
far I've tallied 9 people supporting adoption on the list; if the
remaining supporters wish to be part of the tally, they'd better speak
up now. (I think both of the people not supporting adoption in Lyon have
spoken up.)


Den 20.11.2018 09:57, skrev Harald Alvestrand:
> **
> *From the Lyon summary of decisions:*
> *
> "The WG will ask the list if we should adopt the WEBRTC-QUIC API
> document (in room: 2 opposed, ~10 in favor)"
> The question is whether we should adopt this document:
> **https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-quic/
> as a Working Group document
> Adoption as a WG document does not mean commitment to any specific part
> of the API, or any specific timeline for processing the document to CR
> and beyond, but does mean that we can issue the document as a first
> public working draft (FPWD) and ask for IPR declarations (if any).
> My personal read is that adoption as a WG document means that "we have
> consensus that there is a problem here that needs solving, the problem
> is within the scope of this WG, and this document is a start on the way
> to solving it".
> Non-adoption would indicate either that the problem shouldn't be solved,
> that the problem is out of scope for this WG, or that this document is
> so far away from the right solution that it's not a starting point the
> WG wants to consider.
> We are seeking both statements of support and statements of opposition.
> The chairs will tally the responses and attempt to draw a conclusion.
> Please state your opinion to the**list on or before Wednesday, November 28.
> Harald*,* for the chairs
> *
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2018 12:35:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:18:45 UTC