Re: Clarifications: Call for adoption - WEBRTC-QUIC

I am against adoption.

I would prefer a document that develops an API based on specific set
of requirements,
not based on the specific network protocol.
_____________
Roman Shpount


On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 7:36 AM Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
wrote:

> When tallying the arguments and positions for or against adoption, I was
> unable to determine clearly the position of the following people who
> have participated in the thread:
>
> - Youenn Fablet
> - Cullen Jennings
> - Sergio Garcia Murillo
> - Lennart Grahl
> - Alexey Aylarov
> - Roman Shpout
>
> I could make guesses based on commentary, but that would be guesswork;
> it would be better if the people themselves were to say "Favors
> adoption", "Against adoption", or "Does not wish to be counted".
>
> I also note that in Lyon there were ~10 people supporting adoption; so
> far I've tallied 9 people supporting adoption on the list; if the
> remaining supporters wish to be part of the tally, they'd better speak
> up now. (I think both of the people not supporting adoption in Lyon have
> spoken up.)
>
> Harald
>
>
> Den 20.11.2018 09:57, skrev Harald Alvestrand:
> > **
> >
> > *From the Lyon summary of decisions:*
> >
> > *
> >
> > "The WG will ask the list if we should adopt the WEBRTC-QUIC API
> > document (in room: 2 opposed, ~10 in favor)"
> >
> > The question is whether we should adopt this document:
> >
> > **https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-quic/
> >
> > as a Working Group document
> >
> > Adoption as a WG document does not mean commitment to any specific part
> > of the API, or any specific timeline for processing the document to CR
> > and beyond, but does mean that we can issue the document as a first
> > public working draft (FPWD) and ask for IPR declarations (if any).
> >
> >
> > My personal read is that adoption as a WG document means that "we have
> > consensus that there is a problem here that needs solving, the problem
> > is within the scope of this WG, and this document is a start on the way
> > to solving it".
> >
> > Non-adoption would indicate either that the problem shouldn't be solved,
> > that the problem is out of scope for this WG, or that this document is
> > so far away from the right solution that it's not a starting point the
> > WG wants to consider.
> >
> >
> > We are seeking both statements of support and statements of opposition.
> > The chairs will tally the responses and attempt to draw a conclusion.
> >
> > Please state your opinion to the**list on or before Wednesday, November
> 28.
> >
> > Harald*,* for the chairs
> >
> > *
> >
>
>
>