- From: Feross Aboukhadijeh <feross@feross.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 15:08:50 +0000
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CA+nRAB=D10o3dMin90v-guA_OSZXdvfbA=N19k4zbBKL59e4JA@mail.gmail.com>
I would like to propose that we support WebRTC Data Channel in Workers (`WebWorker`, `ServiceWorker`, etc.) WebRTC DataChannel is basically a drop-in replacement for `WebSocket`, except it's peer-to-peer. For all the same reasons that `WebSocket` was added to the `Worker` spec, we should add WebRTC DataChannel. Here are some possible use cases: - DataChannel in a `ServiceWorker` would support the use case of "peer assisted delivery" a la [PeerCDN](https://www.peercdn.com/faq.html), CDN/P2P CDN video streaming delivery, file transfer, etc. - DataChannel in a `WebWorker` would support offloading CPU intensive data transfer and subsequent processing to another thread. - DataChannel in a `SharedWorker` would let one construct and reuse a DHT (a decentralized/distributed lookup service similar to a hash table) across tabs. Useful for routing to nodes in decentralized applications. Websockets are already available in Workers, so there likely aren't any new security/privacy issues, just potential for exciting new data channel use cases!
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2015 15:09:20 UTC