Re: WebRTC Data Channel in Workers Proposal

On 26 May 2015 at 08:08, Feross Aboukhadijeh <feross@feross.org> wrote:
> I would like to propose that we support WebRTC Data Channel in Workers
> (`WebWorker`, `ServiceWorker`, etc.)


This proposal needs considerably more substance.  For instance, the
implementation of something like this in a ServiceWorker in particular
is not suited to the lifecycle model of service workers.

I get the reasons that this is attractive: it's superfiially very
attractive.  But I think that we need to carefully consider how we
move something of this complexity.