Re: RTCError, DOMError, and... what happened?

On 10/11/13 00:09, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> FWIW, the 2004 (!) version of DOMError contains the "message" field:

Apparently, I don't understand how any of this works. What I found was 
this less-than-a-year-old document, which defines an unusably minimal 

In any case, if we're using objects defined elsewhere as a critical part 
of this spec, can we put a clear documentation citation in here please? 
It's very difficult to take a stab at implementing a sensible error 
reporting scheme when our spec obliquely says "use DOMError," which can 
apparently mean (at least!) three very different things.


Received on Friday, 11 October 2013 13:41:41 UTC