- From: <piranna@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:56:19 +0200
- To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- Cc: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, Frédéric Luart <frederic.luart@apizee.com>, public-webrtc@w3.org, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <CAKfGGh05VB6qhwqLvBSQV+NEGqdWHrQ6t7CVs_th-kv+A=fJPQ@mail.gmail.com>
So, for your answer, I should understand it would be done/masked using high-level libraries, but on the bottom frames of the stack (hidden by WebRTC API or not, like it's at this moment) an offer/answer exchange will be always required, isn't it? El 19/06/2013 16:51, "Iñaki Baz Castillo" <ibc@aliax.net> escribió: > For that you will be able to use LOT of future WebRTC JS libraries coded > by experts (same as jQuery). > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > <ibc@aliax.net> > El 19/06/2013 16:43, "piranna@gmail.com" <piranna@gmail.com> escribió: > >> Maybe a stupid question, but there's no (technical) way to do the >> connection somewhat automatically without developers not needing to work >> with SDPs, but also don't worrying of offer/accept at all? This would be >> the best alternative... >> El 19/06/2013 16:36, "Iñaki Baz Castillo" <ibc@aliax.net> escribió: >> >>> Just this: >>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.html >>> >>> -- >>> Iñaki Baz Castillo >>> <ibc@aliax.net> >>> El 19/06/2013 16:35, "Iñaki Baz Castillo" <ibc@aliax.net> escribió: >>> >>>> Please re-read again. Nobody in that thread is requesting an API for >>>> managing an opaque string. ;) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Iñaki Baz Castillo >>>> <ibc@aliax.net> >>>> El 19/06/2013 16:33, "cowwoc" <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> escribió: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> So having read most of this discussion I'm a bit puzzled. Aren't >>>>> we proposing the same thing? I believe we're both saying that vendors >>>>> should be free to use whatever format they want under the hood (SDP or >>>>> otherwise) but that users should be given a Javascript API for querying and >>>>> manipulating this opaque token. Did I misunderstand? >>>>> >>>>> Gili >>>>> >>>>> On 19/06/2013 10:12 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Offer / Answer. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Iñaki Baz Castillo >>>>> <ibc@aliax.net> >>>>> El 19/06/2013 16:11, "cowwoc" <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> escribió: >>>>> >>>>>> On 19/06/2013 9:42 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> 2013/6/19 cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Honestly, I think this is the wrong approach/workaround. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What do you propose instead? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07880.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07896.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07899.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Iñaki Baz Castillo >>>>>>> <ibc@aliax.net> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> With respect to >>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.htmlwhat does O/A stand for? >>>>>> >>>>>> Gili >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2013 14:56:47 UTC