W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > June 2013

Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API?

From: <piranna@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:56:19 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKfGGh05VB6qhwqLvBSQV+NEGqdWHrQ6t7CVs_th-kv+A=fJPQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Cc: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, Frédéric Luart <frederic.luart@apizee.com>, public-webrtc@w3.org, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
So, for your answer, I should understand it would be done/masked using
high-level libraries, but on the bottom frames of the stack (hidden by
WebRTC API or not, like it's at this moment) an offer/answer exchange will
be always required, isn't it?
El 19/06/2013 16:51, "Iñaki Baz Castillo" <ibc@aliax.net> escribió:

> For that you will be able to use LOT of future WebRTC JS libraries coded
> by experts (same as jQuery).
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc@aliax.net>
> El 19/06/2013 16:43, "piranna@gmail.com" <piranna@gmail.com> escribió:
>
>> Maybe a stupid question, but there's no (technical) way to do the
>> connection somewhat automatically without developers not needing to work
>> with SDPs, but also don't worrying of offer/accept at all? This would be
>> the best alternative...
>> El 19/06/2013 16:36, "Iñaki Baz Castillo" <ibc@aliax.net> escribió:
>>
>>> Just this:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.html
>>>
>>> --
>>> Iñaki Baz Castillo
>>> <ibc@aliax.net>
>>> El 19/06/2013 16:35, "Iñaki Baz Castillo" <ibc@aliax.net> escribió:
>>>
>>>> Please re-read again. Nobody in that thread is requesting an API for
>>>> managing an opaque string. ;)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Iñaki Baz Castillo
>>>> <ibc@aliax.net>
>>>> El 19/06/2013 16:33, "cowwoc" <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> escribió:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     So having read most of this discussion I'm a bit puzzled. Aren't
>>>>> we proposing the same thing? I believe we're both saying that vendors
>>>>> should be free to use whatever format they want under the hood (SDP or
>>>>> otherwise) but that users should be given a Javascript API for querying and
>>>>> manipulating this opaque token. Did I misunderstand?
>>>>>
>>>>> Gili
>>>>>
>>>>> On 19/06/2013 10:12 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Offer / Answer.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Iñaki Baz Castillo
>>>>> <ibc@aliax.net>
>>>>> El 19/06/2013 16:11, "cowwoc" <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> escribió:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 19/06/2013 9:42 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2013/6/19 cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Honestly, I think this is the wrong approach/workaround.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>      What do you propose instead?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07880.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07896.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07899.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Iñaki Baz Castillo
>>>>>>> <ibc@aliax.net>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With respect to
>>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.htmlwhat does O/A stand for?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gili
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2013 14:56:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:33 UTC