- From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:51:19 +0200
- To: piranna@gmail.com
- Cc: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, Frédéric Luart <frederic.luart@apizee.com>, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, public-webrtc@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CALiegfnFiH=4OAXeY8p46mp2c+w0Xegkdf9ypkFgjva4etCbQw@mail.gmail.com>
For that you will be able to use LOT of future WebRTC JS libraries coded by experts (same as jQuery). -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> El 19/06/2013 16:43, "piranna@gmail.com" <piranna@gmail.com> escribió: > Maybe a stupid question, but there's no (technical) way to do the > connection somewhat automatically without developers not needing to work > with SDPs, but also don't worrying of offer/accept at all? This would be > the best alternative... > El 19/06/2013 16:36, "Iñaki Baz Castillo" <ibc@aliax.net> escribió: > >> Just this: >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.html >> >> -- >> Iñaki Baz Castillo >> <ibc@aliax.net> >> El 19/06/2013 16:35, "Iñaki Baz Castillo" <ibc@aliax.net> escribió: >> >>> Please re-read again. Nobody in that thread is requesting an API for >>> managing an opaque string. ;) >>> >>> -- >>> Iñaki Baz Castillo >>> <ibc@aliax.net> >>> El 19/06/2013 16:33, "cowwoc" <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> escribió: >>> >>>> >>>> So having read most of this discussion I'm a bit puzzled. Aren't we >>>> proposing the same thing? I believe we're both saying that vendors should >>>> be free to use whatever format they want under the hood (SDP or otherwise) >>>> but that users should be given a Javascript API for querying and >>>> manipulating this opaque token. Did I misunderstand? >>>> >>>> Gili >>>> >>>> On 19/06/2013 10:12 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: >>>> >>>> Offer / Answer. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Iñaki Baz Castillo >>>> <ibc@aliax.net> >>>> El 19/06/2013 16:11, "cowwoc" <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> escribió: >>>> >>>>> On 19/06/2013 9:42 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> 2013/6/19 cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Honestly, I think this is the wrong approach/workaround. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What do you propose instead? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> This: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07880.html >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.html >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07896.html >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07899.html >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Iñaki Baz Castillo >>>>>> <ibc@aliax.net> >>>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> With respect to >>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.htmlwhat does O/A stand for? >>>>> >>>>> Gili >>>>> >>>> >>>>
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2013 14:51:50 UTC