- From: <piranna@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:43:55 +0200
- To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- Cc: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, Frédéric Luart <frederic.luart@apizee.com>, public-webrtc@w3.org, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <CAKfGGh3cqscQdRuwH-=CjGJURgun_Ryw+iiaGRnn_2sXoNjT1g@mail.gmail.com>
Maybe a stupid question, but there's no (technical) way to do the connection somewhat automatically without developers not needing to work with SDPs, but also don't worrying of offer/accept at all? This would be the best alternative... El 19/06/2013 16:36, "Iñaki Baz Castillo" <ibc@aliax.net> escribió: > Just this: > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.html > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > <ibc@aliax.net> > El 19/06/2013 16:35, "Iñaki Baz Castillo" <ibc@aliax.net> escribió: > >> Please re-read again. Nobody in that thread is requesting an API for >> managing an opaque string. ;) >> >> -- >> Iñaki Baz Castillo >> <ibc@aliax.net> >> El 19/06/2013 16:33, "cowwoc" <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> escribió: >> >>> >>> So having read most of this discussion I'm a bit puzzled. Aren't we >>> proposing the same thing? I believe we're both saying that vendors should >>> be free to use whatever format they want under the hood (SDP or otherwise) >>> but that users should be given a Javascript API for querying and >>> manipulating this opaque token. Did I misunderstand? >>> >>> Gili >>> >>> On 19/06/2013 10:12 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: >>> >>> Offer / Answer. >>> >>> -- >>> Iñaki Baz Castillo >>> <ibc@aliax.net> >>> El 19/06/2013 16:11, "cowwoc" <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> escribió: >>> >>>> On 19/06/2013 9:42 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: >>>> >>>>> 2013/6/19 cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>: >>>>> >>>>>> Honestly, I think this is the wrong approach/workaround. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you propose instead? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07880.html >>>>> >>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.html >>>>> >>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07896.html >>>>> >>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07899.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Iñaki Baz Castillo >>>>> <ibc@aliax.net> >>>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> With respect to >>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.html what >>>> does O/A stand for? >>>> >>>> Gili >>>> >>> >>>
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2013 14:44:23 UTC