- From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:45:09 -0400
- To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- CC: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, public-webrtc@w3.org, piranna@gmail.com, Frédéric Luart <frederic.luart@apizee.com>
- Message-ID: <51C1C3F5.9010101@bbs.darktech.org>
Disregarding the whole section about replacing Offer/Answer since I
believe it is out of scope for this discussion, are you asking for a
Javascript API that interacts directly with WebRTC without having to
pass through a blob/opaque-token? I agree the latter is not ideal, but
at the end of the day what's the big deal? If vendors want SDP and
end-users want a Javascript API, agreeing to a blob is a decent compromise.
Gili
On 19/06/2013 10:36 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>
> Just this:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.html
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc@aliax.net <mailto:ibc@aliax.net>>
>
> El 19/06/2013 16:35, "Iñaki Baz Castillo" <ibc@aliax.net
> <mailto:ibc@aliax.net>> escribió:
>
> Please re-read again. Nobody in that thread is requesting an API
> for managing an opaque string. ;)
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc@aliax.net <mailto:ibc@aliax.net>>
>
> El 19/06/2013 16:33, "cowwoc" <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org
> <mailto:cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>> escribió:
>
>
> So having read most of this discussion I'm a bit puzzled.
> Aren't we proposing the same thing? I believe we're both
> saying that vendors should be free to use whatever format they
> want under the hood (SDP or otherwise) but that users should
> be given a Javascript API for querying and manipulating this
> opaque token. Did I misunderstand?
>
> Gili
>
> On 19/06/2013 10:12 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>>
>> Offer / Answer.
>>
>> --
>> Iñaki Baz Castillo
>> <ibc@aliax.net <mailto:ibc@aliax.net>>
>>
>> El 19/06/2013 16:11, "cowwoc" <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org
>> <mailto:cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>> escribió:
>>
>> On 19/06/2013 9:42 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>>
>> 2013/6/19 cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org
>> <mailto:cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>>:
>>
>> Honestly, I think this is the wrong
>> approach/workaround.
>>
>>
>> What do you propose instead?
>>
>>
>> This:
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07880.html
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.html
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07896.html
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07899.html
>>
>>
>> --
>> Iñaki Baz Castillo
>> <ibc@aliax.net <mailto:ibc@aliax.net>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> With respect to
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.html
>> what does O/A stand for?
>>
>> Gili
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2013 14:45:48 UTC