Just this: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.html -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> El 19/06/2013 16:35, "Iñaki Baz Castillo" <ibc@aliax.net> escribió: > Please re-read again. Nobody in that thread is requesting an API for > managing an opaque string. ;) > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > <ibc@aliax.net> > El 19/06/2013 16:33, "cowwoc" <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> escribió: > >> >> So having read most of this discussion I'm a bit puzzled. Aren't we >> proposing the same thing? I believe we're both saying that vendors should >> be free to use whatever format they want under the hood (SDP or otherwise) >> but that users should be given a Javascript API for querying and >> manipulating this opaque token. Did I misunderstand? >> >> Gili >> >> On 19/06/2013 10:12 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: >> >> Offer / Answer. >> >> -- >> Iñaki Baz Castillo >> <ibc@aliax.net> >> El 19/06/2013 16:11, "cowwoc" <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> escribió: >> >>> On 19/06/2013 9:42 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: >>> >>>> 2013/6/19 cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>: >>>> >>>>> Honestly, I think this is the wrong approach/workaround. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> What do you propose instead? >>>>> >>>> >>>> This: >>>> >>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07880.html >>>> >>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.html >>>> >>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07896.html >>>> >>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07899.html >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Iñaki Baz Castillo >>>> <ibc@aliax.net> >>>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> With respect to >>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.html what >>> does O/A stand for? >>> >>> Gili >>> >> >>
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2013 14:37:10 UTC