W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > June 2013

Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API?

From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:36:43 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfkNhnbgmbjK4pGN6n6QVaRgGrsdMskSw4uR32=gz0x14g@mail.gmail.com>
To: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
Cc: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, public-webrtc@w3.org, piranna@gmail.com, Frédéric Luart <frederic.luart@apizee.com>
Just this: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.html

--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>
El 19/06/2013 16:35, "Iñaki Baz Castillo" <ibc@aliax.net> escribió:

> Please re-read again. Nobody in that thread is requesting an API for
> managing an opaque string. ;)
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc@aliax.net>
> El 19/06/2013 16:33, "cowwoc" <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> escribió:
>
>>
>>     So having read most of this discussion I'm a bit puzzled. Aren't we
>> proposing the same thing? I believe we're both saying that vendors should
>> be free to use whatever format they want under the hood (SDP or otherwise)
>> but that users should be given a Javascript API for querying and
>> manipulating this opaque token. Did I misunderstand?
>>
>> Gili
>>
>> On 19/06/2013 10:12 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>>
>> Offer / Answer.
>>
>> --
>> Iñaki Baz Castillo
>> <ibc@aliax.net>
>> El 19/06/2013 16:11, "cowwoc" <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> escribió:
>>
>>> On 19/06/2013 9:42 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>>>
>>>> 2013/6/19 cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>:
>>>>
>>>>>  Honestly, I think this is the wrong approach/workaround.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>      What do you propose instead?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07880.html
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.html
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07896.html
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07899.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Iñaki Baz Castillo
>>>> <ibc@aliax.net>
>>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> With respect to
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.html what
>>> does O/A stand for?
>>>
>>> Gili
>>>
>>
>>
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2013 14:37:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:33 UTC