Please re-read again. Nobody in that thread is requesting an API for managing an opaque string. ;) -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> El 19/06/2013 16:33, "cowwoc" <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> escribió: > > So having read most of this discussion I'm a bit puzzled. Aren't we > proposing the same thing? I believe we're both saying that vendors should > be free to use whatever format they want under the hood (SDP or otherwise) > but that users should be given a Javascript API for querying and > manipulating this opaque token. Did I misunderstand? > > Gili > > On 19/06/2013 10:12 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > > Offer / Answer. > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > <ibc@aliax.net> > El 19/06/2013 16:11, "cowwoc" <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> escribió: > >> On 19/06/2013 9:42 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: >> >>> 2013/6/19 cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>: >>> >>>> Honestly, I think this is the wrong approach/workaround. >>>>> >>>> >>>> What do you propose instead? >>>> >>> >>> This: >>> >>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07880.html >>> >>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.html >>> >>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07896.html >>> >>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07899.html >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Iñaki Baz Castillo >>> <ibc@aliax.net> >>> >> Hi, >> >> With respect to >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg07895.html what >> does O/A stand for? >> >> Gili >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2013 14:35:47 UTC