W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > December 2013

Re: Future F2F meetings?

From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 15:14:10 +0000
To: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C42DF2E@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>

>
> The IETF rtcweb WG is also discussing a f2f meeting in late May,

I realize the above was based on hearsay; let's phrase it that we will 
look into arranging future f2f meetings in conjunction with future f2f 
rtcweb interim meetings.


>
> Stefan for the chairs
>
> On 2013-12-12 13:07, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote:
>> Sorry for the cross posting, but this relates to both the TF and the WG.
>>
>> We think that f2f meetings are helpful in progressing the work - it
>> gives much higher bandwidth for the discussion. We'd like to get your
>> view about arranging f2f meetings during the first half of next year
>> (and our thinking is that both the Media Cap TF and the WebRTC WG should
>> meet).
>>
>> - One possibility would be to have a meeting (in London) the weekend
>> after the London IETF meeting, March 8-9 2014. The advantage would be
>> that many of the participants in our work would be there anyway because
>> of the IETF meeting.
>>
>> - Another would be to arrange a separate meeting in (perhaps) May next
>> year, possibly jointly with the rtcweb WG of the IETF.
>>
>> What do you think? Would you join? Should we do one of them (which?),
>> none or both?
>>
>> Stefan for the chairs
>>
>> P.S. I know that the WebRTC F2F in Shenzhen did not work that well due
>> to some special circumstances - but F2F meetings are usually very
>> productive IMO
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 20 December 2013 15:15:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:37 UTC