Re: Future F2F meetings?

I think this is a bad idea.

After a week of IETF, people are brutally tired, especially since many of
us have meetings before IETF.

I am fine with a separate interim either alone or joint with RTCWEB.

-Ekr


On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK
<stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
> There was so far no response to this mail.
>
> But in the interest of making progress, we will start to plan for a F2F
> meeting in London (preliminary for the Media Capture TF and the WebRTC
> WG) the weekend after the London IETF meeting (meaning that the dates in
> question are March 7th - 9th). Let us know if you think this is a bad idea.
>
> The IETF rtcweb WG is also discussing a f2f meeting in late May, our
> idea is to make this a joint meeting with W3C WebRTC WG and Media
> Capture TF.
>
> Stefan for the chairs
>
> On 2013-12-12 13:07, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote:
>> Sorry for the cross posting, but this relates to both the TF and the WG.
>>
>> We think that f2f meetings are helpful in progressing the work - it
>> gives much higher bandwidth for the discussion. We'd like to get your
>> view about arranging f2f meetings during the first half of next year
>> (and our thinking is that both the Media Cap TF and the WebRTC WG should
>> meet).
>>
>> - One possibility would be to have a meeting (in London) the weekend
>> after the London IETF meeting, March 8-9 2014. The advantage would be
>> that many of the participants in our work would be there anyway because
>> of the IETF meeting.
>>
>> - Another would be to arrange a separate meeting in (perhaps) May next
>> year, possibly jointly with the rtcweb WG of the IETF.
>>
>> What do you think? Would you join? Should we do one of them (which?),
>> none or both?
>>
>> Stefan for the chairs
>>
>> P.S. I know that the WebRTC F2F in Shenzhen did not work that well due
>> to some special circumstances - but F2F meetings are usually very
>> productive IMO
>>
>>
>
>

Received on Friday, 20 December 2013 13:37:07 UTC