W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > September 2012

Re: Poll for preferred API alternative

From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:37:10 +0000
To: Tim Panton <thp@westhawk.co.uk>
CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E3D49EDB-2768-4DB8-AEDC-2E3DED3AC0AA@cisco.com>

On Aug 31, 2012, at 3:15 PM, Tim Panton <thp@westhawk.co.uk> wrote:

> My experience in phono is that we _always_ have to parse-fillet-rewrite the SDP in both directions to get chrome to interop with anything.

It's true that the current Chrome SDP is not really workable SDP but I think that is simply an issue with they have not got around to that part of yet - the WebRTC/RTCWeb WGs have not even started serious WG discussion about what SDP extensions are going to be MTI. I think the chrome guys intent is to implement SDP that is widely compatible once we get around to figuring out what that is. 
Received on Monday, 3 September 2012 16:37:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:33 UTC