W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > October 2012

RE: TPAC f2f: start building agenda

From: Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 05:29:36 -0700
Message-ID: <E17CAD772E76C742B645BD4DC602CD8106CE0479@NAHALD.us.int.genesyslab.com>
To: "Stefan Hakansson LK" <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, <public-webrtc@w3.org>
  Could we add the topic of reliable media transport for PeerConnection?
I hope the discussion would be brief.

- Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Hakansson LK [mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 5:57 AM
To: public-webrtc@w3.org
Subject: TPAC f2f: start building agenda

Hi all,

the chairs have assembled a list of possible topics for the f2f at TPAC.

It is divided into a "reporting" part and a "discussion" part.

We have 1.5 days (0.5 day reserved for Media Cap TF), so it is obvious
we can't do all of the below. So we would like feedback from all of you

* What topics have we missed?

* What topics (and include the ones we missed in your consideration) do
you think we should spend f2f time on?

Stefan for the chairs

Possible reports:
* Status implementations and testing
** Report from implementers (including feedback)
** Status on testing
* Reporting from Test The Web Forward, Paris?
* Idea: Feedback from reviewers (we could hand out tasks to review 
sections of the draft to people and have them present at the meeting)?

Possible topics for discussion/decision:
* States and Call Flows
** PeerConnection states, ICE agent states
*** what is exposed to the app?
*** what transitions are legal
** what events fire, when?
** What is the signaling seq (SDP exchange)
** Rollback (related to error handling)

* Error handling principles

* Stats
** Object-Attribute model of stats (confirm)
** Naming of objects
** Objects referring to each other: how?

* Application of constraints/settings to MediaStream(Tracks) sent over 
** both at the sending end and at the receiving end
** Signalling recv->sender may be SDP carried - or not
** Examples include AGC (or not), priority, pause/resume, BW setting, 
congestion feedback,
** Should handle added tracks as well
** Can settings/Constraints be changed; or is it one-time (at

* Review of IdP part

* Review of data channel part

* Details that need settling
** Handling of removeTrack/removeStream
*** Are they kept as empty indices in the track-list/stream-list or not?
*** Just pick something
Received on Friday, 12 October 2012 12:30:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:30 UTC