Re: Using W3C Bugzilla for change tracking

As Justin proposes,

let's discuss at the Thursday call.

Stefan

On 12/14/2011 03:08 AM, Soo-Hyun Choi wrote:
>
>
> On 12/14/2011 06:05 AM, Justin Uberti wrote:
>> WG,
>>
>> What are your thoughts on moving to using W3C's Bugzilla instance for
>> managing changes to the spec?
>>
>
> (+1) It looks like a nice idea as it helps on keeping track of changes.
>
>
>> In the recent DTMF discussion, 53 emails were sent across 3 separate
>> threads, with doubtless more still to come as the proposal gets
>> finalized. From my perspective, this makes it hard to fully know the
>> state of the change at any given point in time.
>>
>> Whereas, in other W3C WGs, Bugzilla is used to track spec changes,
>> with a single history of the evolution of the proposal, and a clear
>> indication of closure at the end. Consider this example from the HTML
>> WG: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12938
>>
>> If time permits, perhaps we could discuss this on Thursday's call. Or,
>> if there are no objections, we can try this approach for the DTMF change.
>>
>> --justin
>

Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2011 08:28:59 UTC