- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:16:52 +0000
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-webrtc-editors@w3.org" <public-webrtc-editors@w3.org>
Present: Adam, Dan, Erik, Peter, Stefan
First: Welcome to Erik!!
Process: we should add a label saying something like "waiting for input
from proposer" or something similar, because a lot of the PRs and Issues
are waiting for input.
On 24/06/15 17:21, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> First off: I won't be there.
> Turns out I'm sitting on a plane while you're talking. Stuff happens. Sorry.
>
> Highest priority for the week: Getting out a new getusermedia draft, so
> that Dom can send out the Last Call responses we have prepared (the ones
> that are ready, that is).
Let's go ahead and release a new editors draft. Complete set of changes
for fixing errors will take some time, so let's release without that,
and soon follow up with the error stuff.
Adam will merge #171 with a Note saying this is the first iteration, and
we'll review over weekend (including Cullen), and release a dated
version Monday.
Adam creates the dated version Monday if we're OK.
>
> Media capture and streams
> -------------------------------------
> Pull requests:
> - #171 referring to HTML 5.1 - suggest this is Good Enough now.
Let's put it in, but make it clear that there is work to be done in a
note. Adam to merge and add the note (see above).
> - #181 Remove text about firing event handles - Adam, is it important
> enough that we should do this after #194 is done, but before the new
> editors' draft?
Let's wait for the error stuff to land. Perhaps split this PR into two
to not depend on other stuff.
> - #194 Overconstrainederror - suggest we merge. Only Domenic is capable
> of reviewing this at the moment (just about).
Let's merge this (after we get the dated one out) and ask for comments.
Stefan to make a comment in the PR and ask Dominic and Allen to review.
#199: Adam has commented. Ended event use MediaSteamErrorEvent
structure, but what to if we remove it? We should not combine the two
things, ended event should not be shared with addTrack/removeTrack
event. Dan to rewrite (perhaps make a new PR).
#200: Merged.
>
>
> Issues:
> - #118 Practical algorithm - Cullen reopened it. I asked him to take it
> to the list. No action yet.
> - #127 lack of timeout - still icebox
> - #161 Remove direct assigment - see PR #171
To be closed by Adam once merged #171
> - #162 MediaStreamError - see PR #194
In progress
> - # 176 constrainable pattern shold pass an IDL validator - Adam?
In progress, Adam looking into this.
> - #189 getUserMedia({}) should be a TypeError
More discussion needed - Adam to respond to Jan-Ivar's list mail
> - #191 Support zoom - No
Stefan will comment and close Issue.
> - #192 Support setting focus - No
Stefan will comment "make an extension spec"
> - #193 Adaptive frame rate
> - #196 Spec not tamper proof
Closed - fixed by PR
> - #197 Channel count - NOTE: IPR issue, specific proposal from
> non-WG-member. Suggest ask proposer to join (simplest).
> - #198 Capabilities discovery via EnumerateDevices() - as above.
#201 Needs input from list
>
> Webrtc-PC
> --------------
> Pull requests: 11
>
> Many of these have the problem of proposer not responding.
>
> - #29 mediadiscarded
Peter has reviewed current state now, will work on it.
> - #229 Removing optionality
Merged already.
> - #235 Modernize getStats - I think this is OK
Merged.
> - #236 Replace operations array with chain - Adam?
Adam not happy with the language that is not harmonized with resp of
document. In progress, more work needed e.g. when type checking is done.
> - #237 ReplaceTrack with open issue
No update from Jan-Ivar.
> - #238 Use HTTPS - think we should merge this, or close and do
> search/replace (no response to whitespace complaint)
Assigned to Peter.
> - #239 tidy target - Adam/Dan, is this useful?
Merged.
> - #240 Move certificate management section - sure, why not?
Assigned to Peter.
> - #241 Lots of goodies (DTLStransport, ICEtransport)
More discussion needed.
> - #242 Remove syntax error - dom is most often right
Needs discussion.
> - #243 Mark candidate property required - overlap with #229?
Merged.
>
> Bugs: 32
Did not get there.
>
> We really need to define the icebox for non-1.0 items.... if we have
> time, should we instead discuss how to get 1.0 and "the next version" split?
Hopefully with a "next version" on the radar screen it will be easier to
close 1.0.
>
> (Since I won't be there, leaving decision to my co-chairs)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 25 June 2015 15:17:21 UTC