- From: Renoir Boulanger <renoir@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:17:27 -0400
- To: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>
- CC: WebPlatform Community <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Hi Amelia, You impress me :) Here are my notes. On 2014-09-19, 12:22 PM, Amelia Bellamy-Royds wrote: > Ooops, this should have been on this week's telcon agenda! > > I think Janet is correct, that there should really be a clear, written > policy about this. > > To focus the discussion, I've created a set of clearly defined options from > the comments so far. Could people reply with an indication of which they > would be agreeable to, and which would be a concern? > > Renoir: please reply with a clear deadline for making a decision on the W3C > request. The intended duration is from now until October 29. The W3C comm team wanted this last week. Other sections of the W3C [0][1] are already promoting the W3C20. [0]: http://validator.w3.org/ [1]: http://www.w3devcampus.com/ > Possible policies: > > 1) No promo content on WPD. That's not the purpose of the site, and it > takes time away from other work. + 1/2 > 2) Any steward may request, on occasion, to temporarily replace their logo > in the page footer with a promotional logo, +1 > and to add promotional copy and > links to their steward page (which the footer logos link to). +1 > "On occasion" would need to be clearly defined, e.g., not more than once a > year. Makes sense > The logo© could not imply that WPD endorses or is designed for > any specific product, however. That one is hard to limit reasonably. I would agree fully with you on the limitations if it was about promoting the DevCampus or Validator suite. > 3) A small area for a promo image+link will be added in the page header. > This will only be used to promote events directly related to WPD, e.g. > DocSprints. > > 4) A promo image+link in the page header may be used to promote WPD events, > or W3C events that are of broad interest to the community. > > 5) A promo image+link in the page header may be used to promote events that > are of broad interest to the community (this would have to be more clearly > defined), at the request of any WPD steward. There would need to be > clearly defined limits on how often requests could be made, and how long > the promotion could last, e.g., no more than once a year and no longer than > one month. There would also need to be a policy on conflicting requests > (since we wouldn't want more than one promo at a time): first come, first > served OR split the overlapped time? > > Finally, policies (2)+(3) or (2)+(4) could be combined, creating a very > restricted promo header, but allowing stewards to use the footer logo and > steward page to promote other events. > > I would be supportive of 1-4 or any combination thereof. I'm concerned > that (5) could lead to ongoing debates about what is acceptable and how to > manage conflicting requests. > > But I'm just one contributor, as Doug said in his initial message, it's > important that there is broad community support and support from the > stewards. > > --ABR Well said. I +1 fully all of the above. -- Regards, Renoir Boulanger | Developer operations engineer W3C | Web Platform Project http://w3.org/people/#renoirb ✪ https://renoirboulanger.com/ ✪ @renoirb ~
Received on Friday, 19 September 2014 17:17:35 UTC