W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > March 2014

Re: Our position on vendor prefixed css properties

From: Paul Verbeek <paul@webinthehat.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:57:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHN5aqQ9AdnXw6My+YhDsKJAXE-6HNg=-dwmXxe2njpt4BJ-Xw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>
Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Could anyone give me the rights to remove a page? I'll clean it up a bit.
My username is paulv.


On 12 March 2014 13:38, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com> wrote:

>  Remove.
>
>
>
> These were likely left over from the original import of the content on
> MSDN, where they are appropriate. They don't really apply to Webplatform
> docs.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Eliot
>
>
>
> *From:* verbeek.p@gmail.com [mailto:verbeek.p@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *Paul
> Verbeek
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 12, 2014 1:29 PM
> *To:* public-webplatform@w3.org
> *Subject:* Our position on vendor prefixed css properties
>
>
>
> I was looking through the site and found a few css properties that are
> vendor-prefixed, like
> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/-ms-radial-gradient.
>
>
>
> Are we adding are this vendor prefixed pages or removing them? I would go
> for the latter. Especially in this case because, as far as I know, there
> was never a stable IE version that had this property.
>
>
>
> Paul.
>
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2014 20:58:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:13:59 UTC