W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > March 2014

RE: Our position on vendor prefixed css properties

From: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:38:37 +0000
To: Paul Verbeek <paul@webinthehat.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7e65f704db074c43bcca238ffabbc0e7@BL2PR03MB228.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>

These were likely left over from the original import of the content on MSDN, where they are appropriate. They don't really apply to Webplatform docs.



From: verbeek.p@gmail.com [mailto:verbeek.p@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paul Verbeek
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 1:29 PM
To: public-webplatform@w3.org
Subject: Our position on vendor prefixed css properties

I was looking through the site and found a few css properties that are vendor-prefixed, like http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/-ms-radial-gradient.

Are we adding are this vendor prefixed pages or removing them? I would go for the latter. Especially in this case because, as far as I know, there was never a stable IE version that had this property.

Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2014 20:39:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:13:59 UTC