- From: Paul Verbeek <verbeek.p@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:34:39 +0200
- To: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>
- Cc: List WebPlatform public <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHN5aqQNXpKVZpDiBwWU+tosyFvU6MsdRKzuhRNU7Tv96GPSgw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Amelia, I signed up for the list as well. I can't promise I have the time, but maybe I can manage to squeeze something in. Everything helps, right? Cheers, Paul On 11 June 2014 07:33, Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com> wrote: > We're almost ready to get rolling on the massive blitz to assign readiness > states to every article in the wiki. > > I've updated the project page ( > http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/June2014_QA_Sprint ), and > will be sending all the volunteers a link to a search page with their > assigned articles on Thursday. We'll be trying to get everything done by > the end of June. > > But we've got 4400+ articles and only 10 volunteers so far, so if you > think you can spend a few hours this month madly skimming through web > platform articles, PLEASE SIGN UP on the project page. The more people we > have, the fewer articles we have to do each. > > These are the names I've currently got on the list: > > 1. shepazu > 2. renoirb > 3. jensimmons > 4. julee > 5. eliot > 6. AmeliaBR > 7. eliezerb > 8. garbee > 9. frozenice > 10. Michaela > > > To everyone who has volunteered, please > > - Review the Decision Tree and To-Do lists I posted on the project > page and reply if anything is unclear. > - Indicate next to your name which subject areas > (HTML/DOM/CSS/Javascript/SVG) you're most comfortable with; I'll try to > make most of your articles in those sections > > P.S. If anyone wants to turn the decision tree into a proper flow chart, > that would be great. The list format isn't very easy to read at a glance. > > Best, > Amelia > > > On 27 May 2014 14:25, Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> >> If you read these emails regularly, you know that there have been a >> number of infrastructure activities going on in order to get >> webplatform.org looking professional and ready for public consumption, >> so that we can remove the big purple "*Web Platform Docs is in alpha >> <http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:FAQ>*" warning that is currently >> on the top of every page. >> >> A key part of this is the new article-by-article readiness marker system, >> so that we can clearly indicate to readers which individual pages still >> need work and which are ready to use. We currently have the templates in >> place [1], and Jen Simmons is working on adding some style to make the >> information part of the layout instead of a warning box [2]. >> >> However, for all that to mean anything we need to assign a readiness >> state to each an every article. Currently there are 4408 articles showing >> up in my search of pages that use the readiness template [3], of which 4405 >> are "Unreviewed". >> >> In the weekly teleconferences, it was agreed that the best approach was >> to do this was to divide the articles up among regular contributors (people >> who are familiar with the content expectations and the structure of the >> site), and assign readiness states manually. >> >> *If you can participate, please add your name to the list on the QA >> Sprint project page:* >> >> *http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/June2014_QA_Sprint >> <http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/June2014_QA_Sprint>* >> >> (Note that I've already signed up the "usual suspects", so you might want >> to check and remove your name if you're busy all June!) >> >> At the same time as the readiness review, since we don't want to do this >> again any time soon, we would also want to take care of any other clean-up >> tasks that need to be done manually by someone familiar with the site. >> >> We therefore need to decide on a checklist of Quality Assurance tasks. >> These have to be simple, quick assignments that someone can do without any >> additional research, and which will make a meaningful improvement to the >> consistency and reliability of the site content. So far we have: >> >> *The QA Checklist for June 2014 QA Sprint:* >> 1. Assign a readiness state. More about readiness states (requires >> clean-up) >> 2. Add any details about readiness/what is required to the editorial >> notes box. >> 3. For DOM method pages, assign index values to the parameter entries in >> order to get the correct syntax to display, as described in this email post. >> 4. Confirm that the new compatibility tables are pulling in the correct >> data (Doug Schepers is going to give us more information about this once >> the import from MDN happens later this week). >> >> Possible additions (if we have enough volunteers that we can afford to >> spend more time per page): >> 1. Ensure that every page has a summary section. >> >> I've added a couple other sections and ideas to that project page [4], >> but everything else is still pretty tentative. Ideas and initiative >> welcome -- I'm not going to have time to do much extra work on this myself, >> but we wanted to get the ball rolling sooner rather than later. >> >> Best, >> Amelia >> >> [1]: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webplatform/2014May/0061.html >> [2]: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webplatform/2014May/0056.html >> [3]: http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/Property:State >> [4]: http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/June2014_QA_Sprint >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2014 08:29:27 UTC