- From: Julee <julee@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:33:31 -0800
- To: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>, David Gash <dgash@google.com>
- CC: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CF0D4586.CA193%julee@adobe.com>
Hi, Garbee: Before we move pages, Dave Gash should probably weigh in. He has been working on the reorg for months now, based on Scott’s initial architecture. Dave: Correct me if I’m wrong, but… If there’s some questions, Dave should be in on the discussions. J ------------------- Julee Burdekin Content Strategist Adobe Web Platform @adobejulee julee@adobe.com From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> Date: Sunday, January 26, 2014 at 12:51 PM To: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me> Cc: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org> Subject: Re: DOM reorg project next steps I guess common events can be under events (but should, for correctness, be under GlobalEventHandlers <http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/webappapis.html #globaleventhandlers> . At least those that are specified to be there). If I recall correctly, we chose this route (putting events under their interface) for the APIs hierarchy and I think it makes sense. Only some events are general, a lot of them belong under specific interfaces. ☆PhistucK On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me> wrote: > Ok, I just checked the history of the keypress page and saw it was moved to > KeyboardEvents/keypress as the new organization dictates. So I've moved it > back. > > However, why are we setting URLs based on the interface in play? Couldn't we > simply set the interface as an option in the form compared to using the URL? I > think it would make more sense to have all events under dom/events to make it > easier for developers to find all the events that exist. > > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me> wrote: >> I'm a bit confused on how we are to structure events. Take keypress[1] for >> example. Should I have left it at dom/keyboardEvents/keypress or did I do the >> right thing in moving it to dom/events/keypress? I'd like to know before I >> move further pages as I work on them. >> >> Thanks, >> -Garbee >> >> [1] http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/dom/events/keypress >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:14 PM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote: >>> By the way, I compiled a list back then with articles that should be >>> moved, or various other issues, it might be helpful in your journey as well >>> - >>> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Content_Tasks >>> >>> >>> ☆PhistucK >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: >>>> Hi, Dave– >>>> >>>> I think you're safe to go ahead, thanks! At some point, we should address >>>> PhistucK's suggestion about the "applies_to" field, but I think that's >>>> somewhat orthogonal for now. >>>> >>>> Regards- >>>> -Doug >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12/4/13 3:47 PM, Julee Burdekin wrote: >>>>> Yes, thanks, Dave! Looks like you’re the only one who has been >>>>> working in wiki/dom: >>>>> >>>>> http://docs.webplatform.org/w/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&days=3 >>>>> 0&from=&namespace=0 >>>>> <http://docs.webplatform.org/w/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&days= >>>>> 30&from=&namespace=0> >>>>> >>>>> Regards! >>>>> >>>>> Julee ---------------------------- julee@adobe.com @adobejulee >>>>> >>>>> From: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com >>>>> <mailto:Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com <mailto:Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com> >> >>>>> Date: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 >>>>> >>>>> at 12:38 PM To: David Gash <dgash@google.com >>>>> <mailto:dgash@google.com>>, WebPlatform Public List >>>>> <public-webplatform@w3.org <mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org >>>>> <mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org> >> Cc: >>>>> Peter Lubbers <peterlubbers@google.com >>>>> <mailto:peterlubbers@google.com <mailto:peterlubbers@google.com> >>, Scott >>>>> Rowe <scottrowe@google.com >>>>> <mailto:scottrowe@google.com>> Subject: RE: DOM reorg project next >>>>> >>>>> steps Resent-From: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org >>>>> <mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org <mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org> >> >>>>> Resent-Date: Wednesday, December >>>>> >>>>> 4, 2013 at 12:39 PM >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the notice, Dave! Appreciate the work. >>>>> >>>>> Eliot >>>>> >>>>> *From:*David Gash [mailto:dgash@google.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, >>>>> December 4, 2013 12:37 PM *To:* public-webplatform@w3.org >>>>> <mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org <mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org> > >>>>> *Cc:* Peter Lubbers; Scott Rowe >>>>> *Subject:* DOM reorg project next steps >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> As you may know, one of the big projects on my Google contract is >>>>> reorganizing the pages under docs.webplatform.org/wiki/dom >>>>> <http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/dom> >>>>> <http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/dom >>>>> <http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/dom> >, as outlined in Scott Rowe's >>>>> project document >>>>> <http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/DOM_API_docs >>>>> <http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/DOM_API_docs> >. Most of >>>>> >>>>> these pages were imported and many ended up miscategorized or placed >>>>> under unneccessary interstitials, so I'm moving them about and >>>>> correcting the "applies_to" fields in a concentrated effort to end up >>>>> with a more straightforward, logical URL structure. >>>>> >>>>> I am /not/ editing page content during this project, the goal being >>>>> >>>>> to first get the pages where they belong, so that they can easily be >>>>> found for later updating. >>>>> >>>>> I've been working on this project for several weeks, and have >>>>> completed the dom/apis/audio-video, dom/events, and dom/objects >>>>> branches; this leaves dom/apis, dom/properties, and dom/methods. >>>>> There are just over 600 pages in that set, each of which must be >>>>> examined and either edited & moved or deleted. That's my next group >>>>> to work on. >>>>> >>>>> Peter Lubbers has asked me to post this to the list before I begin >>>>> this group, to make sure that no one else is working on those pages >>>>> and that no one has objections to the plan. If yes to either, please >>>>> let us know. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Dave Gash >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2014 19:34:04 UTC