- From: Eliezer Bernart <eliezer.bernart@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:29:21 -0200
- To: Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com>
- Cc: Webplatform List <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAECTTSrUM4sY7-6jaSXPuAuJ3vsfavwJn2kxncz_01J8m4G0A@mail.gmail.com>
Hey Max, Awesome work again! I have some issues on Examples section [1], where all the content is inside the "Examples" parameter, when actually there is an inner template to that: "Single Example" [2]. About the "Return Value" [3], could we add it in the "JS Syntax" template and display it under a main label ==Return value==? Well, originally I did the JS Object [4] semantic form, it was to be just for the JS Objects, then the ==Properties==, ==Functions==, ==Methods== sections should be some templates with queries to list the pages under other topics. The JS Object doesn't have a "Manual Section", but for now we could duplicate this form to "JS Basic", add a manual section (as the "Main content" field in {{Basic Page}}[5]) and apply to all the JS pages. Then later we can define the topic clusters, design the pages and build a specific semantic form for each one of the Categories. Which one of the topics (Properties, Functions, Methods, and so on) do you think that should have their own form? [1] http://docs.webplatform.org/test/javascript/Array/constructor [2] http://docs.webplatform.org/test/Template:Single_Example [3] http://docs.webplatform.org/test/javascript/Array/isArray [4] http://docs.webplatform.org/test/Form:JS_Object [5] http://docs.webplatform.org/test/Form:Basic Eliezer @eliezerbernart eliezerb On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com> wrote: > A working JavaScript page upload was done on the test wiki: > > http://docs.webplatform.org/test/javascript > > Give it a look if you have time. See if there are any issues with how the > pages look, and the form editing (selecting "Edit" and not "Edit Source" > from the Edit drop down). The major sections on the page are in special > form fields, editable as plain text, rather than Mediawiki format. > > Instead of {{Basic Page}} I'm using {{Topics | JS Object}} to get the form > editing to work. I assume that's the correct template to use for all > JavaScript pages. Eliezer did good work to get the templates and forms to > work correctly, and gave me advice on kinds of templates to use. > > I only noticed one problem. The ==Properties==, ==Functions==, > ==Methods==, and other manual sections did not appear in the "Manual > sections" part of the special form edit when editing the page, so something > may be wrong, but I'm unsure what. Does the {{Topics | JS Object}} > template inhibit manual sections? Or should we use another template > instead? When {{Basic Page}} was used, these manual sections did appear in > the "Main content:" form field area. > > >
Received on Tuesday, 21 January 2014 17:29:48 UTC