- From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 09:09:12 +0300
- To: Francesco Iovine <f.iovine@gmail.com>
- Cc: Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>, Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>, Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>, Julee <julee@adobe.com>, Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABc02_JeiDm=aJKVQctCHq=RwUuyF0=6OkNt1MeR4_+bpJiewg@mail.gmail.com>
The preview is no longer available for some reason (and the post is not published). ☆*PhistucK* On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Francesco Iovine <f.iovine@gmail.com>wrote: > Well done Scott! > > For the post about the birthday party, feel free to use my picture of the > cake if you don't have a better quality photo: > > https://twitter.com/franciov/status/389005249815801856 > > Ciao ;) > > Francesco <https://twitter.com/franciov> > > > On 17 October 2013 00:09, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> ---------------------------- >> julee@adobe.com >> @adobejulee >> >> From: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com> >> Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 3:00 PM >> To: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> >> Cc: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>, julee <julee@adobe.com>, >> Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com>, WebPlatform Public List < >> public-webplatform@w3.org>, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> >> Subject: RE: Birthday blog post >> >> Thanks, Scott.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> So (trying to recap, here), Scott’s gotten feedback, which he can >> incorporate if he chooses. With the exception of linking to or not linking >> to people’s pages, the feedback was made up of suggestions, none of which >> constituted a request to block the publication of the blog post. As far as >> I can tell, everyone said looks good to me.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Is that how others see where we are?**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Thanks,**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Eliot**** >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* Scott Rowe [mailto:scottrowe@google.com <scottrowe@google.com>] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:55 PM >> *To:* Eliot Graff >> *Cc:* Alex Komoroske; Julee; Andre Jay Meissner; >> public-webplatform@w3.org; PhistucK >> *Subject:* Re: Birthday blog post**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Thanks to all who have commented in this thread. While it is lamentable >> that we did not formulate and execute a press strategy for the birthday >> announcement, such a strategy is quite separate from the considerations for >> reporting the business of WPD in the blog. Also, the risk of "blowing" a >> wider publicity opportunity by celebrating our anniversary in the blog is >> not significant.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Following the communication on the subject (that has been in circulation >> on this e-mail list for the last month), here is what we have planned to do: >> **** >> >> ** ** >> >> 1. The first post on the subject was the post announcing the doc sprint >> [1], it effectively invites the community to the birthday party.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> 2. A birthday celebration post (the subject of this thread) that >> recognizes and celebrates the efforts of the whole community over the last >> year. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> 3. A birthday celebration post that chronicles the actual >> birthday-party-slash-doc-sprint anticipated in the earlier blog >> post [1] announcing the doc sprint.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> We are using the blog to celebrate the first anniversary with and for the >> community through several perspectives, with a post for each. (You will >> note that these posts have a common motif: the altered and repurposed >> images of paintings by Dutch masters. Indeed, doing this is not only legal, >> but it is actively encouraged and facilitated by the Rijksmuseum - but that >> may be the subject of yet another blog post and certainly beyond the scope >> of this discussion.)**** >> >> ** ** >> >> The first post was designed to pique interest and generate anticipation >> of the birthday across the community.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> The second post celebrates the birthday for the community generally, and >> those in the community specifically who made outstanding contributions to >> WPD during the year. We would be remiss if we did not acknowledge their >> contributions within the context of a birthday celebration. We may not be >> able to serve them a piece of cake, but we can, and should, include them in >> the celebration.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> The third post will report the results of the >> birthday-party-slash-doc-sprint. It, too will say "Happy Birthday!" and >> acknowledge the contributions of doc sprint participants. This one will >> have the pictures of the cake, as well as the doctored images of paintings >> by Dutch masters, and the compulsory shots of happy, productive doc sprint >> participants.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Note that the blog is largely us speaking to ourselves. It is not a press >> release. Furthermore, with none of this communication are we in danger of >> mis-communicating what is happening on WPD currently. Rather, we are >> responsibly reporting the business of WPD, as the blog intends.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> If the stewards want to generate a public relations announcement, replete >> with a communication strategy like that implemented last year at launch, >> those interested in doing so should get busy now. There are only a few >> weeks left in the month.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> To those of you who have responded with specific comments on the >> substance of this post - credit where credit is due, clarifications, etc. - >> I thank you and I will incorporate your comments.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> [1] >> http://blog.webplatform.org/2013/09/web-platform-doc-sprint-amsterdam-october-12/ >> **** >> >> ** ** >> >> Thanks!**** >> >> ~Scott**** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com> >> wrote:**** >> >> I understand Alex’s concern about wasting our press engagement; however, >> I think that a blog post here is a good idea (with a few edits). **** >> >> **** >> >> We blog (somewhat) regularly about events and milestones. And the press >> does not glom onto them as official press releases. If we do, indeed, lower >> the fanfare a tad and keep this long one of two things will happen. The >> press will either ignore it (most likely, given past behavior), or they >> will notice it and fill copy with it. This is not a big announcement, nor >> is there anything press worthy in it, with one exception: “Webplatform has >> been live for a year. What have they done?” Not a big story. If they *do*want to run the story, though, this provides the background. We should >> really make sure that at the end we say, “We will reach a milestone in the >> next 60 days, one that we are proud of and one which we will announce on >> the blog. Stay tuned….”**** >> >> **** >> >> Overall, I like the post. The litany of accomplishments is good, >> accurate, and not overblown. The section headers could be toned down, but >> the structure and flow are really nice. Great job, Scott!**** >> >> **** >> >> Consistency in the voice would be good, and switching to third person >> would be best, IMHO. From:**** >> >> We’ve also developed a comprehensive CSS properties reference<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties> >> .**** >> >> To**** >> >> The team developed a comprehensive CSS properties reference<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties> >> .**** >> >> Etc.**** >> >> **** >> >> I’d love to be able to edit this, but I am really tied up today and >> tomorrow with the release of IE11 and Windows 8.1.**** >> >> **** >> >> My 2 cents**** >> >> Eliot**** >> >> **** >> >> PS. One specific passage I had a question about was this one:**** >> >> **** >> >> Thanks to the invaluable efforts of Dave Gash<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/User:Dgash>, >> Mike Sierra <http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/User:Sierra>, Lance Leonard<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/User:Lleonard>, >> and many others, we reorganized the API Reference<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/apis>, >> updating 9 imported documents and adding 13 new documents, in over 730 >> pages. **** >> >> **** >> >> I’m not quite sure how to parse that.**** >> >> **** >> >> *From:* Alex Komoroske [mailto:komoroske@google.com] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 16, 2013 9:28 AM >> *To:* Julee >> *Cc:* Eliot Graff; Andre Jay Meissner; Scott Rowe; >> public-webplatform@w3.org; PhistucK**** >> >> >> *Subject:* Re: Birthday blog post**** >> >> **** >> >> I realize my earlier comments may not have been clear.**** >> >> **** >> >> My basic point boils down to: we get one free chance to engage tech press >> for an announcement around our birthday. We're close to having something >> meaty (CSS Properties), but we aren't there yet to have a big announcement. >> A "year in review" that is not positioned to grab press attention (like >> this post) is a *great *idea (and it's extremely well executed and >> exhaustively researched by Scott--many props). I just want to be careful >> about making this a "happy birthday" post that could *accidentally *engage >> the press and blow our one-free-announcement card. **** >> >> **** >> >> Luckily, in my personal opinion it's easy to avoid accidental press >> pickup by softening the "birthday" language, and by keeping it long and in >> depth (so scratch that point in my earlier comments).**** >> >> **** >> >> --Alex (the guy who apparently loves parentheticals) Komoroske**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:**** >> >> Eliot:**** >> >> **** >> >> As the keeper of the blog, what do you think? We talked last Friday about >> having a birthday post sooner rather than later, but I also see Alex's >> point. Would you please weigh in?**** >> >> **** >> >> J**** >> >> ----------------------------**** >> >> julee@adobe.com**** >> >> @adobejulee**** >> >> **** >> >> *From: *Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com> >> *Date: *Wednesday, October 16, 2013 8:44 AM >> *To: *PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> >> *Cc: *Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com>, Scott Rowe < >> scottrowe@google.com>, WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org >> > >> *Subject: *Re: Birthday blog post**** >> >> **** >> >> Thanks for writing this up, Scott! Overall it's well written and gives a >> lot of great shoutouts.**** >> >> **** >> >> A few high-level comments:**** >> >> - The post uses first person a few times, which seems a bit informal >> for an Official Announcement on the Official Blog. (Although it's possible >> I just have weird preferences--what do others think?)**** >> - It's *looooooooong*. It's a great, in-depth overview of progress in >> the past year, but it might be too much for a general audience to read >> through.**** >> - We had talked in the past about using the birthday timing for a >> more concerted marketing push. That implies to me that we might want to >> de-emphasize the one year birthday angle in this post so we can "save it" >> for a bigger push. One way to do that is to keep this post comprehensive >> (which is pretty inside baseball and won't be particularly interesting to >> press), and play down the "OMG it's our birthday" angle just slightly in >> the intro and title. Does that make sense? Is it a silly idea?**** >> >> I haven't had a chance to leave specific, low-level comments.**** >> >> **** >> >> --Alex**** >> >> **** >> >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:12 AM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:**** >> >> Oh, now I see there are two mentions - please, remove both of them (one >> is "Phistuk").**** >> >> **** >> >> Thank you for trying. ;)**** >> >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> ☆*PhistucK***** >> >> **** >> >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:07 PM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:*** >> * >> >> Please, remove my name from the post, I do not need any credit.**** >> >> (It was pointing to the wrong link anyway)**** >> >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> ☆*PhistucK***** >> >> **** >> >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com> >> wrote:**** >> >> Great work Scott! Minor spelling fix (good old "Doc Sprint" FTW!), >> already in. Wondered if we could add 2-3 more images, could just be a pic >> of the great Amsterdam cake and maybe the Doc Sprint logo or so. Also >> thanks for giving me good reason to finally pimp my user profile a bit! :)) >> *Jay**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> *Von: *Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> >> *Datum: *KW 42 | Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013 01:29 >> *An: *"public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org> >> *Betreff: *Birthday blog post >> *Neu gesendet von: *"public-webplatform@w3.org" < >> public-webplatform@w3.org> >> *Neu gesendet am: *KW 42 | Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013 01:30**** >> >> **** >> >> Blog reviewers, please take a look at this draft: **** >> >> **** >> >> http://blog.webplatform.org/?p=729&preview=1&_ppp=9c032ed7ef**** >> >> **** >> >> Append your comments and suggestions to this thread.**** >> >> **** >> >> Thanks!**** >> >> ~Scott**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> ** ** >> > > > Francesco <https://twitter.com/franciov> > > > On 17 October 2013 00:09, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> ---------------------------- >> julee@adobe.com >> @adobejulee >> >> From: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com> >> Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 3:00 PM >> To: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> >> Cc: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>, julee <julee@adobe.com>, >> Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com>, WebPlatform Public List < >> public-webplatform@w3.org>, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> >> Subject: RE: Birthday blog post >> >> Thanks, Scott.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> So (trying to recap, here), Scott’s gotten feedback, which he can >> incorporate if he chooses. With the exception of linking to or not linking >> to people’s pages, the feedback was made up of suggestions, none of which >> constituted a request to block the publication of the blog post. As far as >> I can tell, everyone said looks good to me.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Is that how others see where we are?**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Thanks,**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Eliot**** >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* Scott Rowe [mailto:scottrowe@google.com <scottrowe@google.com>] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:55 PM >> *To:* Eliot Graff >> *Cc:* Alex Komoroske; Julee; Andre Jay Meissner; >> public-webplatform@w3.org; PhistucK >> *Subject:* Re: Birthday blog post**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Thanks to all who have commented in this thread. While it is lamentable >> that we did not formulate and execute a press strategy for the birthday >> announcement, such a strategy is quite separate from the considerations for >> reporting the business of WPD in the blog. Also, the risk of "blowing" a >> wider publicity opportunity by celebrating our anniversary in the blog is >> not significant.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Following the communication on the subject (that has been in circulation >> on this e-mail list for the last month), here is what we have planned to do: >> **** >> >> ** ** >> >> 1. The first post on the subject was the post announcing the doc sprint >> [1], it effectively invites the community to the birthday party.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> 2. A birthday celebration post (the subject of this thread) that >> recognizes and celebrates the efforts of the whole community over the last >> year. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> 3. A birthday celebration post that chronicles the actual >> birthday-party-slash-doc-sprint anticipated in the earlier blog >> post [1] announcing the doc sprint.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> We are using the blog to celebrate the first anniversary with and for the >> community through several perspectives, with a post for each. (You will >> note that these posts have a common motif: the altered and repurposed >> images of paintings by Dutch masters. Indeed, doing this is not only legal, >> but it is actively encouraged and facilitated by the Rijksmuseum - but that >> may be the subject of yet another blog post and certainly beyond the scope >> of this discussion.)**** >> >> ** ** >> >> The first post was designed to pique interest and generate anticipation >> of the birthday across the community.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> The second post celebrates the birthday for the community generally, and >> those in the community specifically who made outstanding contributions to >> WPD during the year. We would be remiss if we did not acknowledge their >> contributions within the context of a birthday celebration. We may not be >> able to serve them a piece of cake, but we can, and should, include them in >> the celebration.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> The third post will report the results of the >> birthday-party-slash-doc-sprint. It, too will say "Happy Birthday!" and >> acknowledge the contributions of doc sprint participants. This one will >> have the pictures of the cake, as well as the doctored images of paintings >> by Dutch masters, and the compulsory shots of happy, productive doc sprint >> participants.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Note that the blog is largely us speaking to ourselves. It is not a press >> release. Furthermore, with none of this communication are we in danger of >> mis-communicating what is happening on WPD currently. Rather, we are >> responsibly reporting the business of WPD, as the blog intends.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> If the stewards want to generate a public relations announcement, replete >> with a communication strategy like that implemented last year at launch, >> those interested in doing so should get busy now. There are only a few >> weeks left in the month.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> To those of you who have responded with specific comments on the >> substance of this post - credit where credit is due, clarifications, etc. - >> I thank you and I will incorporate your comments.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> [1] >> http://blog.webplatform.org/2013/09/web-platform-doc-sprint-amsterdam-october-12/ >> **** >> >> ** ** >> >> Thanks!**** >> >> ~Scott**** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com> >> wrote:**** >> >> I understand Alex’s concern about wasting our press engagement; however, >> I think that a blog post here is a good idea (with a few edits). **** >> >> **** >> >> We blog (somewhat) regularly about events and milestones. And the press >> does not glom onto them as official press releases. If we do, indeed, lower >> the fanfare a tad and keep this long one of two things will happen. The >> press will either ignore it (most likely, given past behavior), or they >> will notice it and fill copy with it. This is not a big announcement, nor >> is there anything press worthy in it, with one exception: “Webplatform has >> been live for a year. What have they done?” Not a big story. If they *do*want to run the story, though, this provides the background. We should >> really make sure that at the end we say, “We will reach a milestone in the >> next 60 days, one that we are proud of and one which we will announce on >> the blog. Stay tuned….”**** >> >> **** >> >> Overall, I like the post. The litany of accomplishments is good, >> accurate, and not overblown. The section headers could be toned down, but >> the structure and flow are really nice. Great job, Scott!**** >> >> **** >> >> Consistency in the voice would be good, and switching to third person >> would be best, IMHO. From:**** >> >> We’ve also developed a comprehensive CSS properties reference<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties> >> .**** >> >> To**** >> >> The team developed a comprehensive CSS properties reference<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties> >> .**** >> >> Etc.**** >> >> **** >> >> I’d love to be able to edit this, but I am really tied up today and >> tomorrow with the release of IE11 and Windows 8.1.**** >> >> **** >> >> My 2 cents**** >> >> Eliot**** >> >> **** >> >> PS. One specific passage I had a question about was this one:**** >> >> **** >> >> Thanks to the invaluable efforts of Dave Gash<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/User:Dgash>, >> Mike Sierra <http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/User:Sierra>, Lance Leonard<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/User:Lleonard>, >> and many others, we reorganized the API Reference<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/apis>, >> updating 9 imported documents and adding 13 new documents, in over 730 >> pages. **** >> >> **** >> >> I’m not quite sure how to parse that.**** >> >> **** >> >> *From:* Alex Komoroske [mailto:komoroske@google.com] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 16, 2013 9:28 AM >> *To:* Julee >> *Cc:* Eliot Graff; Andre Jay Meissner; Scott Rowe; >> public-webplatform@w3.org; PhistucK**** >> >> >> *Subject:* Re: Birthday blog post**** >> >> **** >> >> I realize my earlier comments may not have been clear.**** >> >> **** >> >> My basic point boils down to: we get one free chance to engage tech press >> for an announcement around our birthday. We're close to having something >> meaty (CSS Properties), but we aren't there yet to have a big announcement. >> A "year in review" that is not positioned to grab press attention (like >> this post) is a *great *idea (and it's extremely well executed and >> exhaustively researched by Scott--many props). I just want to be careful >> about making this a "happy birthday" post that could *accidentally *engage >> the press and blow our one-free-announcement card. **** >> >> **** >> >> Luckily, in my personal opinion it's easy to avoid accidental press >> pickup by softening the "birthday" language, and by keeping it long and in >> depth (so scratch that point in my earlier comments).**** >> >> **** >> >> --Alex (the guy who apparently loves parentheticals) Komoroske**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:**** >> >> Eliot:**** >> >> **** >> >> As the keeper of the blog, what do you think? We talked last Friday about >> having a birthday post sooner rather than later, but I also see Alex's >> point. Would you please weigh in?**** >> >> **** >> >> J**** >> >> ----------------------------**** >> >> julee@adobe.com**** >> >> @adobejulee**** >> >> **** >> >> *From: *Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com> >> *Date: *Wednesday, October 16, 2013 8:44 AM >> *To: *PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> >> *Cc: *Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com>, Scott Rowe < >> scottrowe@google.com>, WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org >> > >> *Subject: *Re: Birthday blog post**** >> >> **** >> >> Thanks for writing this up, Scott! Overall it's well written and gives a >> lot of great shoutouts.**** >> >> **** >> >> A few high-level comments:**** >> >> - The post uses first person a few times, which seems a bit informal >> for an Official Announcement on the Official Blog. (Although it's possible >> I just have weird preferences--what do others think?)**** >> - It's *looooooooong*. It's a great, in-depth overview of progress in >> the past year, but it might be too much for a general audience to read >> through.**** >> - We had talked in the past about using the birthday timing for a >> more concerted marketing push. That implies to me that we might want to >> de-emphasize the one year birthday angle in this post so we can "save it" >> for a bigger push. One way to do that is to keep this post comprehensive >> (which is pretty inside baseball and won't be particularly interesting to >> press), and play down the "OMG it's our birthday" angle just slightly in >> the intro and title. Does that make sense? Is it a silly idea?**** >> >> I haven't had a chance to leave specific, low-level comments.**** >> >> **** >> >> --Alex**** >> >> **** >> >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:12 AM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:**** >> >> Oh, now I see there are two mentions - please, remove both of them (one >> is "Phistuk").**** >> >> **** >> >> Thank you for trying. ;)**** >> >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> ☆*PhistucK***** >> >> **** >> >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:07 PM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:*** >> * >> >> Please, remove my name from the post, I do not need any credit.**** >> >> (It was pointing to the wrong link anyway)**** >> >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> ☆*PhistucK***** >> >> **** >> >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com> >> wrote:**** >> >> Great work Scott! Minor spelling fix (good old "Doc Sprint" FTW!), >> already in. Wondered if we could add 2-3 more images, could just be a pic >> of the great Amsterdam cake and maybe the Doc Sprint logo or so. Also >> thanks for giving me good reason to finally pimp my user profile a bit! :)) >> *Jay**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> *Von: *Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> >> *Datum: *KW 42 | Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013 01:29 >> *An: *"public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org> >> *Betreff: *Birthday blog post >> *Neu gesendet von: *"public-webplatform@w3.org" < >> public-webplatform@w3.org> >> *Neu gesendet am: *KW 42 | Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013 01:30**** >> >> **** >> >> Blog reviewers, please take a look at this draft: **** >> >> **** >> >> http://blog.webplatform.org/?p=729&preview=1&_ppp=9c032ed7ef**** >> >> **** >> >> Append your comments and suggestions to this thread.**** >> >> **** >> >> Thanks!**** >> >> ~Scott**** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> **** >> >> ** ** >> > >
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2013 06:10:26 UTC