W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > October 2013

Re: Birthday blog post

From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 09:09:12 +0300
Message-ID: <CABc02_JeiDm=aJKVQctCHq=RwUuyF0=6OkNt1MeR4_+bpJiewg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Francesco Iovine <f.iovine@gmail.com>
Cc: Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>, Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>, Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>, Julee <julee@adobe.com>, Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
The preview is no longer available for some reason (and the post is not
published).


☆*PhistucK*


On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Francesco Iovine <f.iovine@gmail.com>wrote:

> Well done Scott!
>
> For the post about the birthday party, feel free to use my picture of the
> cake if you don't have a better quality photo:
>
> https://twitter.com/franciov/status/389005249815801856
>
> Ciao ;)
>
> Francesco <https://twitter.com/franciov>
>
>
> On 17 October 2013 00:09, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------
>> julee@adobe.com
>> @adobejulee
>>
>> From: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>
>> Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 3:00 PM
>> To: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
>> Cc: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>, julee <julee@adobe.com>,
>> Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com>, WebPlatform Public List <
>> public-webplatform@w3.org>, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
>> Subject: RE: Birthday blog post
>>
>> Thanks, Scott.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> So (trying to recap, here), Scott’s gotten feedback, which he can
>> incorporate if he chooses. With the exception of linking to or not linking
>> to people’s pages, the feedback was made up of suggestions, none of which
>> constituted a request to block the publication of the blog post. As far as
>> I can tell, everyone said looks good to me.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Is that how others see where we are?****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Thanks,****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Eliot****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* Scott Rowe [mailto:scottrowe@google.com <scottrowe@google.com>]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:55 PM
>> *To:* Eliot Graff
>> *Cc:* Alex Komoroske; Julee; Andre Jay Meissner;
>> public-webplatform@w3.org; PhistucK
>> *Subject:* Re: Birthday blog post****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Thanks to all who have commented in this thread. While it is lamentable
>> that we did not formulate and execute a press strategy for the birthday
>> announcement, such a strategy is quite separate from the considerations for
>> reporting the business of WPD in the blog. Also, the risk of "blowing" a
>> wider publicity opportunity by celebrating our anniversary in the blog is
>> not significant.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Following the communication on the subject (that has been in circulation
>> on this e-mail list for the last month), here is what we have planned to do:
>> ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> 1. The first post on the subject was the post announcing the doc sprint
>> [1], it effectively invites the community to the birthday party.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> 2. A birthday celebration post (the subject of this thread) that
>> recognizes and celebrates the efforts of the whole community over the last
>> year. ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> 3. A birthday celebration post that chronicles the actual
>> birthday-party-slash-doc-sprint anticipated in the earlier blog
>> post [1] announcing the doc sprint.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> We are using the blog to celebrate the first anniversary with and for the
>> community through several perspectives, with a post for each. (You will
>> note that these posts have a common motif: the altered and repurposed
>> images of paintings by Dutch masters. Indeed, doing this is not only legal,
>> but it is actively encouraged and facilitated by the Rijksmuseum - but that
>> may be the subject of yet another blog post and certainly beyond the scope
>> of this discussion.)****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> The first post was designed to pique interest and generate anticipation
>> of the birthday across the community.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> The second post celebrates the birthday for the community generally, and
>> those in the community specifically who made outstanding contributions to
>> WPD during the year. We would be remiss if we did not acknowledge their
>> contributions within the context of a birthday celebration. We may not be
>> able to serve them a piece of cake, but we can, and should, include them in
>> the celebration.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> The third post will report the results of the
>> birthday-party-slash-doc-sprint. It, too will say "Happy Birthday!" and
>> acknowledge the contributions of doc sprint participants. This one will
>> have the pictures of the cake, as well as the doctored images of paintings
>> by Dutch masters, and the compulsory shots of happy, productive doc sprint
>> participants.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Note that the blog is largely us speaking to ourselves. It is not a press
>> release. Furthermore, with none of this communication are we in danger of
>> mis-communicating what is happening on WPD currently. Rather, we are
>> responsibly reporting the business of WPD, as the blog intends.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> If the stewards want to generate a public relations announcement, replete
>> with a communication strategy like that implemented last year at launch,
>> those interested in doing so should get busy now. There are only a few
>> weeks left in the month.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> To those of you who have responded with specific comments on the
>> substance of this post - credit where credit is due, clarifications, etc. -
>> I thank you and I will incorporate your comments.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> [1]
>> http://blog.webplatform.org/2013/09/web-platform-doc-sprint-amsterdam-october-12/
>> ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Thanks!****
>>
>> ~Scott****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>
>> wrote:****
>>
>> I understand Alex’s concern about wasting our press engagement; however,
>> I think that a blog post here is a good idea (with a few edits). ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> We blog (somewhat) regularly about events and milestones. And the press
>> does not glom onto them as official press releases. If we do, indeed, lower
>> the fanfare a tad and keep this long one of two things will happen. The
>> press will either ignore it (most likely, given past behavior), or they
>> will notice it and fill copy with it. This is not a big announcement, nor
>> is there anything press worthy in it, with one exception: “Webplatform has
>> been live for a year. What have they done?” Not a big story. If they *do*want to run the story, though, this provides the background. We should
>> really make sure that at the end we say, “We will reach a milestone in the
>> next 60 days, one that we are proud of and one which we will announce on
>> the blog. Stay tuned….”****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Overall, I like the post. The litany of accomplishments is good,
>> accurate, and not overblown. The section headers could be toned down, but
>> the structure and flow are really nice. Great job, Scott!****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Consistency in the voice would be good, and switching to third person
>> would be best, IMHO. From:****
>>
>> We’ve also developed a comprehensive CSS properties reference<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties>
>> .****
>>
>> To****
>>
>> The team developed a comprehensive CSS properties reference<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties>
>> .****
>>
>> Etc.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> I’d love to be able to edit this, but I am really tied up today and
>> tomorrow with the release of IE11 and Windows 8.1.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> My 2 cents****
>>
>> Eliot****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> PS. One specific passage I had a question about was this one:****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Thanks to the invaluable efforts of Dave Gash<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/User:Dgash>,
>> Mike Sierra <http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/User:Sierra>, Lance Leonard<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/User:Lleonard>,
>> and many others, we reorganized the API Reference<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/apis>,
>> updating 9 imported documents and adding 13 new documents, in over 730
>> pages. ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> I’m not quite sure how to parse that.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> *From:* Alex Komoroske [mailto:komoroske@google.com]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 16, 2013 9:28 AM
>> *To:* Julee
>> *Cc:* Eliot Graff; Andre Jay Meissner; Scott Rowe;
>> public-webplatform@w3.org; PhistucK****
>>
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: Birthday blog post****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> I realize my earlier comments may not have been clear.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> My basic point boils down to: we get one free chance to engage tech press
>> for an announcement around our birthday. We're close to having something
>> meaty (CSS Properties), but we aren't there yet to have a big announcement.
>> A "year in review" that is not positioned to grab press attention (like
>> this post) is a *great *idea (and it's extremely well executed and
>> exhaustively researched by Scott--many props). I just want to be careful
>> about making this a "happy birthday" post that could *accidentally *engage
>> the press and blow our one-free-announcement card.  ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Luckily, in my personal opinion it's easy to avoid accidental press
>> pickup by softening the "birthday" language, and by keeping it long and in
>> depth (so scratch that point in my earlier comments).****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> --Alex (the guy who apparently loves parentheticals) Komoroske****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:****
>>
>> Eliot:****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> As the keeper of the blog, what do you think? We talked last Friday about
>> having a birthday post sooner rather than later, but I also see Alex's
>> point. Would you please weigh in?****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> J****
>>
>> ----------------------------****
>>
>> julee@adobe.com****
>>
>> @adobejulee****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> *From: *Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>
>> *Date: *Wednesday, October 16, 2013 8:44 AM
>> *To: *PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
>> *Cc: *Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com>, Scott Rowe <
>> scottrowe@google.com>, WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org
>> >
>> *Subject: *Re: Birthday blog post****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Thanks for writing this up, Scott! Overall it's well written and gives a
>> lot of great shoutouts.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> A few high-level comments:****
>>
>>    - The post uses first person a few times, which seems a bit informal
>>    for an Official Announcement on the Official Blog. (Although it's possible
>>    I just have weird preferences--what do others think?)****
>>    - It's *looooooooong*. It's a great, in-depth overview of progress in
>>    the past year, but it might be too much for a general audience to read
>>    through.****
>>    - We had talked in the past about using the birthday timing for a
>>    more concerted marketing push. That implies to me that we might want to
>>    de-emphasize the one year birthday angle in this post so we can "save it"
>>    for a bigger push. One way to do that is to keep this post comprehensive
>>    (which is pretty inside baseball and won't be particularly interesting to
>>    press), and play down the "OMG it's our birthday" angle just slightly in
>>    the intro and title. Does that make sense? Is it a silly idea?****
>>
>> I haven't had a chance to leave specific, low-level comments.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> --Alex****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:12 AM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:****
>>
>> Oh, now I see there are two mentions - please, remove both of them (one
>> is "Phistuk").****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Thank you for trying. ;)****
>>
>>
>> ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> ☆*PhistucK*****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:07 PM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:***
>> *
>>
>> Please, remove my name from the post, I do not need any credit.****
>>
>> (It was pointing to the wrong link anyway)****
>>
>>
>> ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> ☆*PhistucK*****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com>
>> wrote:****
>>
>> Great work Scott! Minor spelling fix (good old "Doc Sprint" FTW!),
>> already in. Wondered if we could add 2-3 more images, could just be a pic
>> of the great Amsterdam cake and maybe the Doc Sprint logo or so. Also
>> thanks for giving me good reason to finally pimp my user profile a bit! :))
>> *Jay****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> *Von: *Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
>> *Datum: *KW 42 | Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013 01:29
>> *An: *"public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>> *Betreff: *Birthday blog post
>> *Neu gesendet von: *"public-webplatform@w3.org" <
>> public-webplatform@w3.org>
>> *Neu gesendet am: *KW 42 | Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013 01:30****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Blog reviewers, please take a look at this draft: ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> http://blog.webplatform.org/?p=729&preview=1&_ppp=9c032ed7ef****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Append your comments and suggestions to this thread.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Thanks!****
>>
>> ~Scott****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>>   ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>
>
> Francesco <https://twitter.com/franciov>
>
>
> On 17 October 2013 00:09, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------
>> julee@adobe.com
>> @adobejulee
>>
>> From: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>
>> Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 3:00 PM
>> To: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
>> Cc: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>, julee <julee@adobe.com>,
>> Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com>, WebPlatform Public List <
>> public-webplatform@w3.org>, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
>> Subject: RE: Birthday blog post
>>
>> Thanks, Scott.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> So (trying to recap, here), Scott’s gotten feedback, which he can
>> incorporate if he chooses. With the exception of linking to or not linking
>> to people’s pages, the feedback was made up of suggestions, none of which
>> constituted a request to block the publication of the blog post. As far as
>> I can tell, everyone said looks good to me.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Is that how others see where we are?****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Thanks,****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Eliot****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* Scott Rowe [mailto:scottrowe@google.com <scottrowe@google.com>]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:55 PM
>> *To:* Eliot Graff
>> *Cc:* Alex Komoroske; Julee; Andre Jay Meissner;
>> public-webplatform@w3.org; PhistucK
>> *Subject:* Re: Birthday blog post****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Thanks to all who have commented in this thread. While it is lamentable
>> that we did not formulate and execute a press strategy for the birthday
>> announcement, such a strategy is quite separate from the considerations for
>> reporting the business of WPD in the blog. Also, the risk of "blowing" a
>> wider publicity opportunity by celebrating our anniversary in the blog is
>> not significant.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Following the communication on the subject (that has been in circulation
>> on this e-mail list for the last month), here is what we have planned to do:
>> ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> 1. The first post on the subject was the post announcing the doc sprint
>> [1], it effectively invites the community to the birthday party.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> 2. A birthday celebration post (the subject of this thread) that
>> recognizes and celebrates the efforts of the whole community over the last
>> year. ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> 3. A birthday celebration post that chronicles the actual
>> birthday-party-slash-doc-sprint anticipated in the earlier blog
>> post [1] announcing the doc sprint.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> We are using the blog to celebrate the first anniversary with and for the
>> community through several perspectives, with a post for each. (You will
>> note that these posts have a common motif: the altered and repurposed
>> images of paintings by Dutch masters. Indeed, doing this is not only legal,
>> but it is actively encouraged and facilitated by the Rijksmuseum - but that
>> may be the subject of yet another blog post and certainly beyond the scope
>> of this discussion.)****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> The first post was designed to pique interest and generate anticipation
>> of the birthday across the community.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> The second post celebrates the birthday for the community generally, and
>> those in the community specifically who made outstanding contributions to
>> WPD during the year. We would be remiss if we did not acknowledge their
>> contributions within the context of a birthday celebration. We may not be
>> able to serve them a piece of cake, but we can, and should, include them in
>> the celebration.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> The third post will report the results of the
>> birthday-party-slash-doc-sprint. It, too will say "Happy Birthday!" and
>> acknowledge the contributions of doc sprint participants. This one will
>> have the pictures of the cake, as well as the doctored images of paintings
>> by Dutch masters, and the compulsory shots of happy, productive doc sprint
>> participants.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Note that the blog is largely us speaking to ourselves. It is not a press
>> release. Furthermore, with none of this communication are we in danger of
>> mis-communicating what is happening on WPD currently. Rather, we are
>> responsibly reporting the business of WPD, as the blog intends.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> If the stewards want to generate a public relations announcement, replete
>> with a communication strategy like that implemented last year at launch,
>> those interested in doing so should get busy now. There are only a few
>> weeks left in the month.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> To those of you who have responded with specific comments on the
>> substance of this post - credit where credit is due, clarifications, etc. -
>> I thank you and I will incorporate your comments.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> [1]
>> http://blog.webplatform.org/2013/09/web-platform-doc-sprint-amsterdam-october-12/
>> ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Thanks!****
>>
>> ~Scott****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>
>> wrote:****
>>
>> I understand Alex’s concern about wasting our press engagement; however,
>> I think that a blog post here is a good idea (with a few edits). ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> We blog (somewhat) regularly about events and milestones. And the press
>> does not glom onto them as official press releases. If we do, indeed, lower
>> the fanfare a tad and keep this long one of two things will happen. The
>> press will either ignore it (most likely, given past behavior), or they
>> will notice it and fill copy with it. This is not a big announcement, nor
>> is there anything press worthy in it, with one exception: “Webplatform has
>> been live for a year. What have they done?” Not a big story. If they *do*want to run the story, though, this provides the background. We should
>> really make sure that at the end we say, “We will reach a milestone in the
>> next 60 days, one that we are proud of and one which we will announce on
>> the blog. Stay tuned….”****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Overall, I like the post. The litany of accomplishments is good,
>> accurate, and not overblown. The section headers could be toned down, but
>> the structure and flow are really nice. Great job, Scott!****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Consistency in the voice would be good, and switching to third person
>> would be best, IMHO. From:****
>>
>> We’ve also developed a comprehensive CSS properties reference<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties>
>> .****
>>
>> To****
>>
>> The team developed a comprehensive CSS properties reference<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties>
>> .****
>>
>> Etc.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> I’d love to be able to edit this, but I am really tied up today and
>> tomorrow with the release of IE11 and Windows 8.1.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> My 2 cents****
>>
>> Eliot****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> PS. One specific passage I had a question about was this one:****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Thanks to the invaluable efforts of Dave Gash<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/User:Dgash>,
>> Mike Sierra <http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/User:Sierra>, Lance Leonard<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/User:Lleonard>,
>> and many others, we reorganized the API Reference<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/apis>,
>> updating 9 imported documents and adding 13 new documents, in over 730
>> pages. ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> I’m not quite sure how to parse that.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> *From:* Alex Komoroske [mailto:komoroske@google.com]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 16, 2013 9:28 AM
>> *To:* Julee
>> *Cc:* Eliot Graff; Andre Jay Meissner; Scott Rowe;
>> public-webplatform@w3.org; PhistucK****
>>
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: Birthday blog post****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> I realize my earlier comments may not have been clear.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> My basic point boils down to: we get one free chance to engage tech press
>> for an announcement around our birthday. We're close to having something
>> meaty (CSS Properties), but we aren't there yet to have a big announcement.
>> A "year in review" that is not positioned to grab press attention (like
>> this post) is a *great *idea (and it's extremely well executed and
>> exhaustively researched by Scott--many props). I just want to be careful
>> about making this a "happy birthday" post that could *accidentally *engage
>> the press and blow our one-free-announcement card.  ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Luckily, in my personal opinion it's easy to avoid accidental press
>> pickup by softening the "birthday" language, and by keeping it long and in
>> depth (so scratch that point in my earlier comments).****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> --Alex (the guy who apparently loves parentheticals) Komoroske****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:****
>>
>> Eliot:****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> As the keeper of the blog, what do you think? We talked last Friday about
>> having a birthday post sooner rather than later, but I also see Alex's
>> point. Would you please weigh in?****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> J****
>>
>> ----------------------------****
>>
>> julee@adobe.com****
>>
>> @adobejulee****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> *From: *Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>
>> *Date: *Wednesday, October 16, 2013 8:44 AM
>> *To: *PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
>> *Cc: *Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com>, Scott Rowe <
>> scottrowe@google.com>, WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org
>> >
>> *Subject: *Re: Birthday blog post****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Thanks for writing this up, Scott! Overall it's well written and gives a
>> lot of great shoutouts.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> A few high-level comments:****
>>
>>    - The post uses first person a few times, which seems a bit informal
>>    for an Official Announcement on the Official Blog. (Although it's possible
>>    I just have weird preferences--what do others think?)****
>>    - It's *looooooooong*. It's a great, in-depth overview of progress in
>>    the past year, but it might be too much for a general audience to read
>>    through.****
>>    - We had talked in the past about using the birthday timing for a
>>    more concerted marketing push. That implies to me that we might want to
>>    de-emphasize the one year birthday angle in this post so we can "save it"
>>    for a bigger push. One way to do that is to keep this post comprehensive
>>    (which is pretty inside baseball and won't be particularly interesting to
>>    press), and play down the "OMG it's our birthday" angle just slightly in
>>    the intro and title. Does that make sense? Is it a silly idea?****
>>
>> I haven't had a chance to leave specific, low-level comments.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> --Alex****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:12 AM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:****
>>
>> Oh, now I see there are two mentions - please, remove both of them (one
>> is "Phistuk").****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Thank you for trying. ;)****
>>
>>
>> ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> ☆*PhistucK*****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:07 PM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:***
>> *
>>
>> Please, remove my name from the post, I do not need any credit.****
>>
>> (It was pointing to the wrong link anyway)****
>>
>>
>> ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> ☆*PhistucK*****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com>
>> wrote:****
>>
>> Great work Scott! Minor spelling fix (good old "Doc Sprint" FTW!),
>> already in. Wondered if we could add 2-3 more images, could just be a pic
>> of the great Amsterdam cake and maybe the Doc Sprint logo or so. Also
>> thanks for giving me good reason to finally pimp my user profile a bit! :))
>> *Jay****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> *Von: *Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
>> *Datum: *KW 42 | Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013 01:29
>> *An: *"public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>> *Betreff: *Birthday blog post
>> *Neu gesendet von: *"public-webplatform@w3.org" <
>> public-webplatform@w3.org>
>> *Neu gesendet am: *KW 42 | Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013 01:30****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Blog reviewers, please take a look at this draft: ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> http://blog.webplatform.org/?p=729&preview=1&_ppp=9c032ed7ef****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Append your comments and suggestions to this thread.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Thanks!****
>>
>> ~Scott****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>>   ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2013 06:10:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:13:55 UTC