- From: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 07:47:39 -0700
- To: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
- Cc: Francesco Iovine <f.iovine@gmail.com>, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>, Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>, Julee <julee@adobe.com>, Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHZLcPpw+zhZeTAvHztr7RCZ1wf6k3bc6Rce4HLBv_XHFE55yA@mail.gmail.com>
Hmm. Works for me. I removed all your citations, as requested, PhistucK. ~Scott On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:09 PM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote: > The preview is no longer available for some reason (and the post is not > published). > > > ☆*PhistucK* > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Francesco Iovine <f.iovine@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Well done Scott! >> >> For the post about the birthday party, feel free to use my picture of the >> cake if you don't have a better quality photo: >> >> https://twitter.com/franciov/status/389005249815801856 >> >> Ciao ;) >> >> Francesco <https://twitter.com/franciov> >> >> >> On 17 October 2013 00:09, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------- >>> julee@adobe.com >>> @adobejulee >>> >>> From: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com> >>> Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 3:00 PM >>> To: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> >>> Cc: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>, julee <julee@adobe.com>, >>> Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com>, WebPlatform Public List < >>> public-webplatform@w3.org>, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> >>> Subject: RE: Birthday blog post >>> >>> Thanks, Scott.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> So (trying to recap, here), Scott’s gotten feedback, which he can >>> incorporate if he chooses. With the exception of linking to or not linking >>> to people’s pages, the feedback was made up of suggestions, none of which >>> constituted a request to block the publication of the blog post. As far as >>> I can tell, everyone said looks good to me.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Is that how others see where we are?**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Thanks,**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Eliot**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> *From:* Scott Rowe [mailto:scottrowe@google.com <scottrowe@google.com>] >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:55 PM >>> *To:* Eliot Graff >>> *Cc:* Alex Komoroske; Julee; Andre Jay Meissner; >>> public-webplatform@w3.org; PhistucK >>> *Subject:* Re: Birthday blog post**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Thanks to all who have commented in this thread. While it is lamentable >>> that we did not formulate and execute a press strategy for the birthday >>> announcement, such a strategy is quite separate from the considerations for >>> reporting the business of WPD in the blog. Also, the risk of "blowing" a >>> wider publicity opportunity by celebrating our anniversary in the blog is >>> not significant.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Following the communication on the subject (that has been in circulation >>> on this e-mail list for the last month), here is what we have planned to do: >>> **** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> 1. The first post on the subject was the post announcing the doc sprint >>> [1], it effectively invites the community to the birthday party.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> 2. A birthday celebration post (the subject of this thread) that >>> recognizes and celebrates the efforts of the whole community over the last >>> year. **** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> 3. A birthday celebration post that chronicles the actual >>> birthday-party-slash-doc-sprint anticipated in the earlier blog >>> post [1] announcing the doc sprint.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> We are using the blog to celebrate the first anniversary with and for >>> the community through several perspectives, with a post for each. (You will >>> note that these posts have a common motif: the altered and repurposed >>> images of paintings by Dutch masters. Indeed, doing this is not only legal, >>> but it is actively encouraged and facilitated by the Rijksmuseum - but that >>> may be the subject of yet another blog post and certainly beyond the scope >>> of this discussion.)**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> The first post was designed to pique interest and generate anticipation >>> of the birthday across the community.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> The second post celebrates the birthday for the community generally, and >>> those in the community specifically who made outstanding contributions to >>> WPD during the year. We would be remiss if we did not acknowledge their >>> contributions within the context of a birthday celebration. We may not be >>> able to serve them a piece of cake, but we can, and should, include them in >>> the celebration.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> The third post will report the results of the >>> birthday-party-slash-doc-sprint. It, too will say "Happy Birthday!" and >>> acknowledge the contributions of doc sprint participants. This one will >>> have the pictures of the cake, as well as the doctored images of paintings >>> by Dutch masters, and the compulsory shots of happy, productive doc sprint >>> participants.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Note that the blog is largely us speaking to ourselves. It is not a >>> press release. Furthermore, with none of this communication are we in >>> danger of mis-communicating what is happening on WPD currently. Rather, we >>> are responsibly reporting the business of WPD, as the blog intends.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> If the stewards want to generate a public relations announcement, >>> replete with a communication strategy like that implemented last year at >>> launch, those interested in doing so should get busy now. There are only a >>> few weeks left in the month.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> To those of you who have responded with specific comments on the >>> substance of this post - credit where credit is due, clarifications, etc. - >>> I thank you and I will incorporate your comments.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> [1] >>> http://blog.webplatform.org/2013/09/web-platform-doc-sprint-amsterdam-october-12/ >>> **** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Thanks!**** >>> >>> ~Scott**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> I understand Alex’s concern about wasting our press engagement; however, >>> I think that a blog post here is a good idea (with a few edits). **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> We blog (somewhat) regularly about events and milestones. And the press >>> does not glom onto them as official press releases. If we do, indeed, lower >>> the fanfare a tad and keep this long one of two things will happen. The >>> press will either ignore it (most likely, given past behavior), or they >>> will notice it and fill copy with it. This is not a big announcement, nor >>> is there anything press worthy in it, with one exception: “Webplatform has >>> been live for a year. What have they done?” Not a big story. If they *do >>> * want to run the story, though, this provides the background. We >>> should really make sure that at the end we say, “We will reach a milestone >>> in the next 60 days, one that we are proud of and one which we will >>> announce on the blog. Stay tuned….”**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Overall, I like the post. The litany of accomplishments is good, >>> accurate, and not overblown. The section headers could be toned down, but >>> the structure and flow are really nice. Great job, Scott!**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Consistency in the voice would be good, and switching to third person >>> would be best, IMHO. From:**** >>> >>> We’ve also developed a comprehensive CSS properties reference<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties> >>> .**** >>> >>> To**** >>> >>> The team developed a comprehensive CSS properties reference<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties> >>> .**** >>> >>> Etc.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> I’d love to be able to edit this, but I am really tied up today and >>> tomorrow with the release of IE11 and Windows 8.1.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> My 2 cents**** >>> >>> Eliot**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> PS. One specific passage I had a question about was this one:**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Thanks to the invaluable efforts of Dave Gash<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/User:Dgash>, >>> Mike Sierra <http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/User:Sierra>, Lance >>> Leonard <http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/User:Lleonard>, and many >>> others, we reorganized the API Reference<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/apis>, >>> updating 9 imported documents and adding 13 new documents, in over 730 >>> pages. **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> I’m not quite sure how to parse that.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> *From:* Alex Komoroske [mailto:komoroske@google.com] >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 16, 2013 9:28 AM >>> *To:* Julee >>> *Cc:* Eliot Graff; Andre Jay Meissner; Scott Rowe; >>> public-webplatform@w3.org; PhistucK**** >>> >>> >>> *Subject:* Re: Birthday blog post**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> I realize my earlier comments may not have been clear.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> My basic point boils down to: we get one free chance to engage tech >>> press for an announcement around our birthday. We're close to having >>> something meaty (CSS Properties), but we aren't there yet to have a big >>> announcement. A "year in review" that is not positioned to grab press >>> attention (like this post) is a *great *idea (and it's extremely well >>> executed and exhaustively researched by Scott--many props). I just want to >>> be careful about making this a "happy birthday" post that could *accidentally >>> *engage the press and blow our one-free-announcement card. **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Luckily, in my personal opinion it's easy to avoid accidental press >>> pickup by softening the "birthday" language, and by keeping it long and in >>> depth (so scratch that point in my earlier comments).**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> --Alex (the guy who apparently loves parentheticals) Komoroske**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:**** >>> >>> Eliot:**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> As the keeper of the blog, what do you think? We talked last Friday >>> about having a birthday post sooner rather than later, but I also see >>> Alex's point. Would you please weigh in?**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> J**** >>> >>> ----------------------------**** >>> >>> julee@adobe.com**** >>> >>> @adobejulee**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> *From: *Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com> >>> *Date: *Wednesday, October 16, 2013 8:44 AM >>> *To: *PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> >>> *Cc: *Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com>, Scott Rowe < >>> scottrowe@google.com>, WebPlatform Public List < >>> public-webplatform@w3.org> >>> *Subject: *Re: Birthday blog post**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Thanks for writing this up, Scott! Overall it's well written and gives a >>> lot of great shoutouts.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> A few high-level comments:**** >>> >>> - The post uses first person a few times, which seems a bit informal >>> for an Official Announcement on the Official Blog. (Although it's possible >>> I just have weird preferences--what do others think?)**** >>> - It's *looooooooong*. It's a great, in-depth overview of progress >>> in the past year, but it might be too much for a general audience to read >>> through.**** >>> - We had talked in the past about using the birthday timing for a >>> more concerted marketing push. That implies to me that we might want to >>> de-emphasize the one year birthday angle in this post so we can "save it" >>> for a bigger push. One way to do that is to keep this post comprehensive >>> (which is pretty inside baseball and won't be particularly interesting to >>> press), and play down the "OMG it's our birthday" angle just slightly in >>> the intro and title. Does that make sense? Is it a silly idea?**** >>> >>> I haven't had a chance to leave specific, low-level comments.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> --Alex**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:12 AM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:*** >>> * >>> >>> Oh, now I see there are two mentions - please, remove both of them (one >>> is "Phistuk").**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Thank you for trying. ;)**** >>> >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> ☆*PhistucK***** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:07 PM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:** >>> ** >>> >>> Please, remove my name from the post, I do not need any credit.**** >>> >>> (It was pointing to the wrong link anyway)**** >>> >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> ☆*PhistucK***** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> Great work Scott! Minor spelling fix (good old "Doc Sprint" FTW!), >>> already in. Wondered if we could add 2-3 more images, could just be a pic >>> of the great Amsterdam cake and maybe the Doc Sprint logo or so. Also >>> thanks for giving me good reason to finally pimp my user profile a bit! :)) >>> *Jay**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> *Von: *Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> >>> *Datum: *KW 42 | Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013 01:29 >>> *An: *"public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org> >>> *Betreff: *Birthday blog post >>> *Neu gesendet von: *"public-webplatform@w3.org" < >>> public-webplatform@w3.org> >>> *Neu gesendet am: *KW 42 | Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013 01:30**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Blog reviewers, please take a look at this draft: **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> http://blog.webplatform.org/?p=729&preview=1&_ppp=9c032ed7ef**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Append your comments and suggestions to this thread.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Thanks!**** >>> >>> ~Scott**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >> >> >> Francesco <https://twitter.com/franciov> >> >> >> On 17 October 2013 00:09, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------- >>> julee@adobe.com >>> @adobejulee >>> >>> From: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com> >>> Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 3:00 PM >>> To: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> >>> Cc: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>, julee <julee@adobe.com>, >>> Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com>, WebPlatform Public List < >>> public-webplatform@w3.org>, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> >>> Subject: RE: Birthday blog post >>> >>> Thanks, Scott.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> So (trying to recap, here), Scott’s gotten feedback, which he can >>> incorporate if he chooses. With the exception of linking to or not linking >>> to people’s pages, the feedback was made up of suggestions, none of which >>> constituted a request to block the publication of the blog post. As far as >>> I can tell, everyone said looks good to me.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Is that how others see where we are?**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Thanks,**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Eliot**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> *From:* Scott Rowe [mailto:scottrowe@google.com <scottrowe@google.com>] >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:55 PM >>> *To:* Eliot Graff >>> *Cc:* Alex Komoroske; Julee; Andre Jay Meissner; >>> public-webplatform@w3.org; PhistucK >>> *Subject:* Re: Birthday blog post**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Thanks to all who have commented in this thread. While it is lamentable >>> that we did not formulate and execute a press strategy for the birthday >>> announcement, such a strategy is quite separate from the considerations for >>> reporting the business of WPD in the blog. Also, the risk of "blowing" a >>> wider publicity opportunity by celebrating our anniversary in the blog is >>> not significant.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Following the communication on the subject (that has been in circulation >>> on this e-mail list for the last month), here is what we have planned to do: >>> **** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> 1. The first post on the subject was the post announcing the doc sprint >>> [1], it effectively invites the community to the birthday party.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> 2. A birthday celebration post (the subject of this thread) that >>> recognizes and celebrates the efforts of the whole community over the last >>> year. **** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> 3. A birthday celebration post that chronicles the actual >>> birthday-party-slash-doc-sprint anticipated in the earlier blog >>> post [1] announcing the doc sprint.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> We are using the blog to celebrate the first anniversary with and for >>> the community through several perspectives, with a post for each. (You will >>> note that these posts have a common motif: the altered and repurposed >>> images of paintings by Dutch masters. Indeed, doing this is not only legal, >>> but it is actively encouraged and facilitated by the Rijksmuseum - but that >>> may be the subject of yet another blog post and certainly beyond the scope >>> of this discussion.)**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> The first post was designed to pique interest and generate anticipation >>> of the birthday across the community.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> The second post celebrates the birthday for the community generally, and >>> those in the community specifically who made outstanding contributions to >>> WPD during the year. We would be remiss if we did not acknowledge their >>> contributions within the context of a birthday celebration. We may not be >>> able to serve them a piece of cake, but we can, and should, include them in >>> the celebration.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> The third post will report the results of the >>> birthday-party-slash-doc-sprint. It, too will say "Happy Birthday!" and >>> acknowledge the contributions of doc sprint participants. This one will >>> have the pictures of the cake, as well as the doctored images of paintings >>> by Dutch masters, and the compulsory shots of happy, productive doc sprint >>> participants.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Note that the blog is largely us speaking to ourselves. It is not a >>> press release. Furthermore, with none of this communication are we in >>> danger of mis-communicating what is happening on WPD currently. Rather, we >>> are responsibly reporting the business of WPD, as the blog intends.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> If the stewards want to generate a public relations announcement, >>> replete with a communication strategy like that implemented last year at >>> launch, those interested in doing so should get busy now. There are only a >>> few weeks left in the month.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> To those of you who have responded with specific comments on the >>> substance of this post - credit where credit is due, clarifications, etc. - >>> I thank you and I will incorporate your comments.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> [1] >>> http://blog.webplatform.org/2013/09/web-platform-doc-sprint-amsterdam-october-12/ >>> **** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Thanks!**** >>> >>> ~Scott**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> I understand Alex’s concern about wasting our press engagement; however, >>> I think that a blog post here is a good idea (with a few edits). **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> We blog (somewhat) regularly about events and milestones. And the press >>> does not glom onto them as official press releases. If we do, indeed, lower >>> the fanfare a tad and keep this long one of two things will happen. The >>> press will either ignore it (most likely, given past behavior), or they >>> will notice it and fill copy with it. This is not a big announcement, nor >>> is there anything press worthy in it, with one exception: “Webplatform has >>> been live for a year. What have they done?” Not a big story. If they *do >>> * want to run the story, though, this provides the background. We >>> should really make sure that at the end we say, “We will reach a milestone >>> in the next 60 days, one that we are proud of and one which we will >>> announce on the blog. Stay tuned….”**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Overall, I like the post. The litany of accomplishments is good, >>> accurate, and not overblown. The section headers could be toned down, but >>> the structure and flow are really nice. Great job, Scott!**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Consistency in the voice would be good, and switching to third person >>> would be best, IMHO. From:**** >>> >>> We’ve also developed a comprehensive CSS properties reference<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties> >>> .**** >>> >>> To**** >>> >>> The team developed a comprehensive CSS properties reference<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties> >>> .**** >>> >>> Etc.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> I’d love to be able to edit this, but I am really tied up today and >>> tomorrow with the release of IE11 and Windows 8.1.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> My 2 cents**** >>> >>> Eliot**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> PS. One specific passage I had a question about was this one:**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Thanks to the invaluable efforts of Dave Gash<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/User:Dgash>, >>> Mike Sierra <http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/User:Sierra>, Lance >>> Leonard <http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/User:Lleonard>, and many >>> others, we reorganized the API Reference<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/apis>, >>> updating 9 imported documents and adding 13 new documents, in over 730 >>> pages. **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> I’m not quite sure how to parse that.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> *From:* Alex Komoroske [mailto:komoroske@google.com] >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 16, 2013 9:28 AM >>> *To:* Julee >>> *Cc:* Eliot Graff; Andre Jay Meissner; Scott Rowe; >>> public-webplatform@w3.org; PhistucK**** >>> >>> >>> *Subject:* Re: Birthday blog post**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> I realize my earlier comments may not have been clear.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> My basic point boils down to: we get one free chance to engage tech >>> press for an announcement around our birthday. We're close to having >>> something meaty (CSS Properties), but we aren't there yet to have a big >>> announcement. A "year in review" that is not positioned to grab press >>> attention (like this post) is a *great *idea (and it's extremely well >>> executed and exhaustively researched by Scott--many props). I just want to >>> be careful about making this a "happy birthday" post that could *accidentally >>> *engage the press and blow our one-free-announcement card. **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Luckily, in my personal opinion it's easy to avoid accidental press >>> pickup by softening the "birthday" language, and by keeping it long and in >>> depth (so scratch that point in my earlier comments).**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> --Alex (the guy who apparently loves parentheticals) Komoroske**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:**** >>> >>> Eliot:**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> As the keeper of the blog, what do you think? We talked last Friday >>> about having a birthday post sooner rather than later, but I also see >>> Alex's point. Would you please weigh in?**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> J**** >>> >>> ----------------------------**** >>> >>> julee@adobe.com**** >>> >>> @adobejulee**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> *From: *Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com> >>> *Date: *Wednesday, October 16, 2013 8:44 AM >>> *To: *PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> >>> *Cc: *Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com>, Scott Rowe < >>> scottrowe@google.com>, WebPlatform Public List < >>> public-webplatform@w3.org> >>> *Subject: *Re: Birthday blog post**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Thanks for writing this up, Scott! Overall it's well written and gives a >>> lot of great shoutouts.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> A few high-level comments:**** >>> >>> - The post uses first person a few times, which seems a bit informal >>> for an Official Announcement on the Official Blog. (Although it's possible >>> I just have weird preferences--what do others think?)**** >>> - It's *looooooooong*. It's a great, in-depth overview of progress >>> in the past year, but it might be too much for a general audience to read >>> through.**** >>> - We had talked in the past about using the birthday timing for a >>> more concerted marketing push. That implies to me that we might want to >>> de-emphasize the one year birthday angle in this post so we can "save it" >>> for a bigger push. One way to do that is to keep this post comprehensive >>> (which is pretty inside baseball and won't be particularly interesting to >>> press), and play down the "OMG it's our birthday" angle just slightly in >>> the intro and title. Does that make sense? Is it a silly idea?**** >>> >>> I haven't had a chance to leave specific, low-level comments.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> --Alex**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:12 AM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:*** >>> * >>> >>> Oh, now I see there are two mentions - please, remove both of them (one >>> is "Phistuk").**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Thank you for trying. ;)**** >>> >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> ☆*PhistucK***** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:07 PM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:** >>> ** >>> >>> Please, remove my name from the post, I do not need any credit.**** >>> >>> (It was pointing to the wrong link anyway)**** >>> >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> ☆*PhistucK***** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> Great work Scott! Minor spelling fix (good old "Doc Sprint" FTW!), >>> already in. Wondered if we could add 2-3 more images, could just be a pic >>> of the great Amsterdam cake and maybe the Doc Sprint logo or so. Also >>> thanks for giving me good reason to finally pimp my user profile a bit! :)) >>> *Jay**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> *Von: *Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> >>> *Datum: *KW 42 | Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013 01:29 >>> *An: *"public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org> >>> *Betreff: *Birthday blog post >>> *Neu gesendet von: *"public-webplatform@w3.org" < >>> public-webplatform@w3.org> >>> *Neu gesendet am: *KW 42 | Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013 01:30**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Blog reviewers, please take a look at this draft: **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> http://blog.webplatform.org/?p=729&preview=1&_ppp=9c032ed7ef**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Append your comments and suggestions to this thread.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Thanks!**** >>> >>> ~Scott**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2013 14:48:12 UTC