Re: A few properties that may need re-prioritizing

That list looks much more sane. Let me check against that…

J


----------------------------
julee@adobe.com
@adobejulee

From: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com<mailto:scottrowe@google.com>>
Date: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 5:15 PM
To: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com<mailto:komoroske@google.com>>
Cc: julee <julee@adobe.com<mailto:julee@adobe.com>>, WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org<mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: A few properties that may need re-prioritizing

We can cross-check with Chromestatus [1] to see if the results are any different.

[1] http://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/css/popularity

Also, background-position-x|y are not spec'd, and there hasn't been any discussion about it since last year.

~Scott



On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com<mailto:komoroske@google.com>> wrote:
Other than background-position-x and background-position-y, I'm surprised that those pages are so popular on Opera. However, given that we know they're popular (unless we have some reason to doubt those stats), it seems to make sense to add them to the list.


On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Julee <julee@adobe.com<mailto:julee@adobe.com>> wrote:
Hi, Folks:

I've been trying to finalize the master list so I can post status. (We're so close!) I will send a long list of properties we will not be doing, so folks can review it.

But just now, I compared the full list to the most popular properties listed on the Opera site.[1] And I did come up with a few properties that seem to be popular:

* background-position-x
* background-position-y
* ime-mode
* layout-flow
* speak
* text-justify-trim
* text-kashida-space
* user-select

Should we up the priority on these and get them done?

What do you think?

Julee
[1] http://devfiles.myopera.com/articles/599/cssproplist-url.htm
----------------------------
julee@adobe.com<mailto:julee@adobe.com>
@adobejulee