- From: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 08:44:16 -0800
- To: Doug May <intuedge@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHZLcPpcQZPr8_DmArkfVRMexxyBZ4Ks0m6F73YEzFoSO5BWrw@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Doug, I appreciate your enthusiasm! And we should be judicious of our time and resources. If time futzing around with priorities would be just as well spent working on the issues, then it's not worth doing. Furthermore, it's all got to be done sooner or later. I think people will be capable of picking the more important issues out of a list without having guidance in the form of "P0" or "P1" or whatever. In other news, I've created the new High-level issue property, "Needs Review." (Hoo boy, did it take forever to figure out the property page name for this!) So now, once an article is de-flagged or created, the editor can set the "Needs Review" flag, and the issue will get listed under "Articles Needing Review" in the Getting Started page. I've also made a copy of the Getting Started page in my User: directory and have begun tinkering with redesign. See you all in the conf call! +Scott On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Doug May <intuedge@gmail.com> wrote: > Still getting used to the public list. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > To: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> > Cc: wrong address > > > ... the process of assigning priority is going to be manual > > and messy. > > If you insist.... > > In my book, laziness is the mother of invention, and I've managed to > eliminate or at least streamline a lot of manual processes over the > years. > > I look forward to at least trying. > > DougM > >
Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 16:44:49 UTC