- From: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 15:50:01 -0800
- To: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHZLcPpXW63qE8pWkq2Ui7cUCV1K2BpWf9D=W+==MjqZvxX_Tg@mail.gmail.com>
Oops. The link to the Verbatims page is actually: http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Community/Survey/Verbatims Apologies, +Scott On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > First, let's forestall the inevitable argument about the use of > "verbatims" as a noun. There. Thanks. :) > > Now, the results of our community outreach efforts over the last two Doc > Sprints may be found in the Survey<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Community/Survey/Doc_Sprint/Berlin_2-2013>and > Verbatims<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Community/Survey/Doc_Sprint/Berlin_2-2013>pages. Note that the survey covers only the Berlin Doc Sprint of February 8 > & 9. Since we only received two responses to the survey from the San > Francisco Doc Sprint on February 23, those results are not evaluated. The > verbatim responses (there, I used it properly) are from both Doc Sprints, > including the observations gathered in San Francisco. > > I am reluctant to draw broad conclusions based on the data gathered thus > far. I'd like to wait until the survey is made generally available > (independent of doc sprints and maintained perpetually), to modify the > survey to capture the important issues, and I'd like for us to first > address the more obvious and easy (low-hanging fruit) issues before we > resume surveillance. > > That said, based on these results, many of our initial assumptions have > been challenged, and there are some obvious and immediate measures we can > take to make contributing to WebPlatform.org easier for our community - the > aforementioned low-hanging fruit. > > *Navigation* > > The lack of visibility into site architecture and options is crippling our > ability to find pages, to start working in the wiki, and to participating > in the community. We need a first- and second-tier navigation widget. > Baring that, consider the alternatives mentioned below. > > *Search* > > Since the problems with navigation are perceived as being insurmountable > at this time, let me humbly suggest that we at least fix our search. We > need to remove the duplication of pages in the search results. We should > also make WPD:* pages available to the index (at least for the time being, > while we are in pre-release mode). I watched a guy nearly loose his temper > over our obvious ineptitude in this area. > > *Getting Started* > > The path from the home page, or any page, to the Getting Started and > Editor's Guide pages needs to be clearer. Without a navigation widget, we > should consider links in the navigation bar - and remove links that don't > work for the time being: > > Docs Getting Started Editors Guide Community Pages Blog > > I'll even take bold flashing red text (a la 1995) seriously at this point. > > The Getting Started page needs to be reorganized to present tasks based on > domain expertise, skills, and roles. We should also remove those tasks that > we really don't expect people to perform as they are only cluttering the > page. > > * * * * * > > The good news is that just fixing these three things will help immensely, > maybe even measurably. In this Friday's teleconference let's talk about how > go about it. > > There are dozens of bugs revealed in the Verbatims<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Community/Survey/Doc_Sprint/Berlin_2-2013>. > Some exist, some we'll have to create. The remaining work on that page is > to run through the list and assign a bug to each issue or otherwise deal > with it. We can talk about that on Friday, too. > > +Scott > >
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2013 23:50:30 UTC