Re: Talk sub-domain and chat page.

This is a great thing to do, the infrastructure section is best for most of
the stuff you will be doing it seems. So, that would be the area to place
it. I just went and made your account an admin and assigned you to the
developers and staff members groups.

I'm going to assign you as the owner of that project once I get
confirmation from Doug and/or Ryan that it is OK to do so.


On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Renoir B. <renoirb@gmail.com> wrote:

> Let's keep an issue in buggenie ("project...") assigned to me.
>
> Actually, many issues should be assigned to me and anyway, I'll use
> buggenie  to maintain my task trail.
>
> Is it ok?
>
> -
> Renoir Boulanger
> Software & Frontend developer
> https://renoirboulanger.com/#is
> ~
> ~
> On Jul 30, 2013 5:32 PM, "Jonathan Garbee" <jonathan.garbee@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Whoops, accidentally sent this just to Renoir. So, sending to the ML:
>>
>> I just don't see a use for the subdomain anymore. If the a11y group is
>> going to use q2a then that is fine (however it can't be plugged into the
>> docs auth lest we want to reinvarnate the session bug. ) But, keeping it up
>> just to use the chat page, not worth it imo.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Jonathan Garbee <
>> jonathan.garbee@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I just don't see a use for the subdomain anymore. If the a11y group is
>>> going to use q2a then that is fine (however it can't be plugged into the
>>> docs auth lest we want to reinvarnate the session bug. ) But, keeping it up
>>> just to use the chat page, not worth it imo.
>>>  On Jul 30, 2013 5:13 PM, "Renoir B." <renoirb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think we should still have it.
>>>>
>>>> Unless we have instances budget limitations already running short.
>>>>
>>>> I would suggest to enable the feature within less than a month after I
>>>> worked on some improvements.
>>>>
>>>> During that time, I will have time spent to find the bottlenecks and
>>>> set some improvements, and ensure the feature doesn't affect the rest of
>>>> the site as the analytics was doing.
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> *Renoir Boulanger*
>>>> Frontend & software developer
>>>>
>>>> *renoir*boulanger.com/#is <https://renoirboulanger.com/#is> <-- vient
>>>> d'être refait!
>>>> ~
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 30 July 2013 16:31, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi, Garbee:
>>>>>
>>>>> Re: #1: It was discussed at a general meeting. Doug was following up.
>>>>> So he can do that with the a11y folks. Just wanted to make a note of that.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's cool that we have the webchat. And I understand why we have to
>>>>> move it, and get rid of talk. But now that I think about it, what about
>>>>> just keeping Discussion and having it point to webchat? Then, more folks
>>>>> would show up on the IRC and be in the live stream of WPD life.
>>>>>
>>>>> What do others think?
>>>>>
>>>>> J
>>>>> ----------------------------
>>>>> julee@adobe.com
>>>>> @adobejulee
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan.garbee@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:57 AM
>>>>>
>>>>> To: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>>>>> Subject: Re: Talk sub-domain and chat page.
>>>>>
>>>>> Resent-From: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>>>>> Resent-Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:57 AM
>>>>>
>>>>> For point one, I haven't seen any Mailing list discussion about that
>>>>> (probably just lost in gmail somewhere if it did occur) and I have only
>>>>> heard some comments in IRC about it, so I have no clue on the status of an
>>>>> a11y forum.
>>>>>
>>>>> We do have webchat functionality, with my improved version [1] it
>>>>> includes a freenode webchat embed. That is why it would be moved off the
>>>>> talk subdomain onto www. To keep the infrastructure simpler.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 to remove Discussion. That kind of thing should be gotten to
>>>>> through the Community page.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi, Garbee:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please let me know if any of this is incorrect:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    1. Forums is down, due to technical difficulties. When we can put
>>>>>>    it back into production is unknown. So we won't be supporting an
>>>>>>    accessibility forum there as we previously discussed until further notice.
>>>>>>    2. We currently do not have IRC web chat functionality on this
>>>>>>    site.
>>>>>>    3. Since there's no forums and not web chat, for now, we're going
>>>>>>    to take down talk.webplatform.org altogether.
>>>>>>    4. Since there's no talk.webplatform.org, we should also remove
>>>>>>    the global nav "Discussion" from everywhere:
>>>>>>       - Www
>>>>>>       - Docs
>>>>>>       - Blog
>>>>>>       - Project
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Julee
>>>>>> ----------------------------
>>>>>> julee@adobe.com
>>>>>> @adobejulee
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan.garbee@gmail.com>
>>>>>> Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:44 AM
>>>>>> To: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>>>>>> Subject: Talk sub-domain and chat page.
>>>>>> Resent-From: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>>>>>> Resent-Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:44 AM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The talk sub-domain no longer has a reason to stick around. The only
>>>>>> thing hosted there is the defunct chat page. I think we should simply turn
>>>>>> off the talk subdomain and move the chat page (with improvements [1]) to
>>>>>> the primary www domain. This will reduce the sub-domains that need to be
>>>>>> maintained and simplify management.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any issues going down this road?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Garbee
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] http://jonathan.garbee.me/chat/
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>