- From: Renoir B. <renoirb@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 17:38:33 -0400
- To: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan.garbee@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-webplatform@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAEWz3DBvM+qrgqFUXL6CPKLbXt4mFk0Cx+8ZcoRT6nGfUbLBuw@mail.gmail.com>
Let's keep an issue in buggenie ("project...") assigned to me. Actually, many issues should be assigned to me and anyway, I'll use buggenie to maintain my task trail. Is it ok? - Renoir Boulanger Software & Frontend developer https://renoirboulanger.com/#is ~ ~ On Jul 30, 2013 5:32 PM, "Jonathan Garbee" <jonathan.garbee@gmail.com> wrote: > Whoops, accidentally sent this just to Renoir. So, sending to the ML: > > I just don't see a use for the subdomain anymore. If the a11y group is > going to use q2a then that is fine (however it can't be plugged into the > docs auth lest we want to reinvarnate the session bug. ) But, keeping it up > just to use the chat page, not worth it imo. > > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Jonathan Garbee < > jonathan.garbee@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I just don't see a use for the subdomain anymore. If the a11y group is >> going to use q2a then that is fine (however it can't be plugged into the >> docs auth lest we want to reinvarnate the session bug. ) But, keeping it up >> just to use the chat page, not worth it imo. >> On Jul 30, 2013 5:13 PM, "Renoir B." <renoirb@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I think we should still have it. >>> >>> Unless we have instances budget limitations already running short. >>> >>> I would suggest to enable the feature within less than a month after I >>> worked on some improvements. >>> >>> During that time, I will have time spent to find the bottlenecks and set >>> some improvements, and ensure the feature doesn't affect the rest of the >>> site as the analytics was doing. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> *Renoir Boulanger* >>> Frontend & software developer >>> >>> *renoir*boulanger.com/#is <https://renoirboulanger.com/#is> <-- vient >>> d'être refait! >>> ~ >>> >>> >>> On 30 July 2013 16:31, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, Garbee: >>>> >>>> Re: #1: It was discussed at a general meeting. Doug was following up. >>>> So he can do that with the a11y folks. Just wanted to make a note of that. >>>> >>>> That's cool that we have the webchat. And I understand why we have to >>>> move it, and get rid of talk. But now that I think about it, what about >>>> just keeping Discussion and having it point to webchat? Then, more folks >>>> would show up on the IRC and be in the live stream of WPD life. >>>> >>>> What do others think? >>>> >>>> J >>>> ---------------------------- >>>> julee@adobe.com >>>> @adobejulee >>>> >>>> From: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan.garbee@gmail.com> >>>> Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:57 AM >>>> >>>> To: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org> >>>> Subject: Re: Talk sub-domain and chat page. >>>> >>>> Resent-From: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org> >>>> Resent-Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:57 AM >>>> >>>> For point one, I haven't seen any Mailing list discussion about that >>>> (probably just lost in gmail somewhere if it did occur) and I have only >>>> heard some comments in IRC about it, so I have no clue on the status of an >>>> a11y forum. >>>> >>>> We do have webchat functionality, with my improved version [1] it >>>> includes a freenode webchat embed. That is why it would be moved off the >>>> talk subdomain onto www. To keep the infrastructure simpler. >>>> >>>> +1 to remove Discussion. That kind of thing should be gotten to through >>>> the Community page. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, Garbee: >>>>> >>>>> Please let me know if any of this is incorrect: >>>>> >>>>> 1. Forums is down, due to technical difficulties. When we can put >>>>> it back into production is unknown. So we won't be supporting an >>>>> accessibility forum there as we previously discussed until further notice. >>>>> 2. We currently do not have IRC web chat functionality on this >>>>> site. >>>>> 3. Since there's no forums and not web chat, for now, we're going >>>>> to take down talk.webplatform.org altogether. >>>>> 4. Since there's no talk.webplatform.org, we should also remove >>>>> the global nav "Discussion" from everywhere: >>>>> - Www >>>>> - Docs >>>>> - Blog >>>>> - Project >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> Julee >>>>> ---------------------------- >>>>> julee@adobe.com >>>>> @adobejulee >>>>> >>>>> From: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan.garbee@gmail.com> >>>>> Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:44 AM >>>>> To: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org> >>>>> Subject: Talk sub-domain and chat page. >>>>> Resent-From: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org> >>>>> Resent-Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:44 AM >>>>> >>>>> The talk sub-domain no longer has a reason to stick around. The only >>>>> thing hosted there is the defunct chat page. I think we should simply turn >>>>> off the talk subdomain and move the chat page (with improvements [1]) to >>>>> the primary www domain. This will reduce the sub-domains that need to be >>>>> maintained and simplify management. >>>>> >>>>> Any issues going down this road? >>>>> >>>>> -Garbee >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://jonathan.garbee.me/chat/ >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >
Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2013 21:39:01 UTC