- From: Renoir B. <renoirb@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 17:38:33 -0400
- To: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan.garbee@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-webplatform@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAEWz3DBvM+qrgqFUXL6CPKLbXt4mFk0Cx+8ZcoRT6nGfUbLBuw@mail.gmail.com>
Let's keep an issue in buggenie ("project...") assigned to me.
Actually, many issues should be assigned to me and anyway, I'll use
buggenie  to maintain my task trail.
Is it ok?
-
Renoir Boulanger
Software & Frontend developer
https://renoirboulanger.com/#is
~
~
On Jul 30, 2013 5:32 PM, "Jonathan Garbee" <jonathan.garbee@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Whoops, accidentally sent this just to Renoir. So, sending to the ML:
>
> I just don't see a use for the subdomain anymore. If the a11y group is
> going to use q2a then that is fine (however it can't be plugged into the
> docs auth lest we want to reinvarnate the session bug. ) But, keeping it up
> just to use the chat page, not worth it imo.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Jonathan Garbee <
> jonathan.garbee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I just don't see a use for the subdomain anymore. If the a11y group is
>> going to use q2a then that is fine (however it can't be plugged into the
>> docs auth lest we want to reinvarnate the session bug. ) But, keeping it up
>> just to use the chat page, not worth it imo.
>>  On Jul 30, 2013 5:13 PM, "Renoir B." <renoirb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think we should still have it.
>>>
>>> Unless we have instances budget limitations already running short.
>>>
>>> I would suggest to enable the feature within less than a month after I
>>> worked on some improvements.
>>>
>>> During that time, I will have time spent to find the bottlenecks and set
>>> some improvements, and ensure the feature doesn't affect the rest of the
>>> site as the analytics was doing.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> *Renoir Boulanger*
>>> Frontend & software developer
>>>
>>> *renoir*boulanger.com/#is <https://renoirboulanger.com/#is> <-- vient
>>> d'être refait!
>>> ~
>>>
>>>
>>> On 30 July 2013 16:31, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, Garbee:
>>>>
>>>> Re: #1: It was discussed at a general meeting. Doug was following up.
>>>> So he can do that with the a11y folks. Just wanted to make a note of that.
>>>>
>>>> That's cool that we have the webchat. And I understand why we have to
>>>> move it, and get rid of talk. But now that I think about it, what about
>>>> just keeping Discussion and having it point to webchat? Then, more folks
>>>> would show up on the IRC and be in the live stream of WPD life.
>>>>
>>>> What do others think?
>>>>
>>>> J
>>>> ----------------------------
>>>> julee@adobe.com
>>>> @adobejulee
>>>>
>>>> From: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan.garbee@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:57 AM
>>>>
>>>> To: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: Talk sub-domain and chat page.
>>>>
>>>> Resent-From: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>>>> Resent-Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:57 AM
>>>>
>>>> For point one, I haven't seen any Mailing list discussion about that
>>>> (probably just lost in gmail somewhere if it did occur) and I have only
>>>> heard some comments in IRC about it, so I have no clue on the status of an
>>>> a11y forum.
>>>>
>>>> We do have webchat functionality, with my improved version [1] it
>>>> includes a freenode webchat embed. That is why it would be moved off the
>>>> talk subdomain onto www. To keep the infrastructure simpler.
>>>>
>>>> +1 to remove Discussion. That kind of thing should be gotten to through
>>>> the Community page.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi, Garbee:
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let me know if any of this is incorrect:
>>>>>
>>>>>    1. Forums is down, due to technical difficulties. When we can put
>>>>>    it back into production is unknown. So we won't be supporting an
>>>>>    accessibility forum there as we previously discussed until further notice.
>>>>>    2. We currently do not have IRC web chat functionality on this
>>>>>    site.
>>>>>    3. Since there's no forums and not web chat, for now, we're going
>>>>>    to take down talk.webplatform.org altogether.
>>>>>    4. Since there's no talk.webplatform.org, we should also remove
>>>>>    the global nav "Discussion" from everywhere:
>>>>>       - Www
>>>>>       - Docs
>>>>>       - Blog
>>>>>       - Project
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Julee
>>>>> ----------------------------
>>>>> julee@adobe.com
>>>>> @adobejulee
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan.garbee@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:44 AM
>>>>> To: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>>>>> Subject: Talk sub-domain and chat page.
>>>>> Resent-From: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>>>>> Resent-Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 11:44 AM
>>>>>
>>>>> The talk sub-domain no longer has a reason to stick around. The only
>>>>> thing hosted there is the defunct chat page. I think we should simply turn
>>>>> off the talk subdomain and move the chat page (with improvements [1]) to
>>>>> the primary www domain. This will reduce the sub-domains that need to be
>>>>> maintained and simplify management.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any issues going down this road?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Garbee
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://jonathan.garbee.me/chat/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2013 21:39:01 UTC