Re: Values of CSS properties

While I understand what <length> means exactly, I am not sure everyone
does. In order to be correct and accurate, as well as usable for newcomers,
I think we should have <length> as well as one or two quick and short
examples to make the newcomers figure out the usage easily and quickly.

So, say -
background-position: <length> <length>;
  background-position: 20px 30px;
  background-position: 15em 5%;

Or something similar.


☆*PhistucK*


On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Lea Verou <lea@w3.org> wrote:

> Yes, that’s what I’m talking about. Glad we agree. Anyone else want to
> chime in?
>
> Lea Verou
> W3C developer relations
> http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿ http://lea.verou.me ✿ @leaverou
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 25, 2013, at 23:31, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi, Lea: Are you talking about where it lists the values:
> >
> > Values
> >
> > 20px 40px
> >     Any standard CSS...
> >
> > Yes, I agree: <length> is better than some arbitrary example value.
> >
> > J
> >
> > ----------------------------
> > julee@adobe.com
> > @adobejulee
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From:  Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>
> > Date:  Thursday, July 25, 2013 1:25 PM
> > To:  WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org>
> > Subject:  Values of CSS properties
> >
> >
> > I see this pattern in many CSS properties. For example,
> > http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/background-positionSome
> > have generic data types as values (e.g. length), others try to use
> > specific examples.
> > What’s the correct way?
> > Personally, I think specific examples can be confusing, since the reader
> > needs to extrapolate the general rule.
> >
> > Lea Verou
> > W3C developer relations
> > http://w3.org/people/all#lea ? http://lea.verou.me ? @leaverou
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>