- From: Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 23:32:58 +0300
- To: Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>
- Cc: WebPlatform Community <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Yes, that’s what I’m talking about. Glad we agree. Anyone else want to chime in? Lea Verou W3C developer relations http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿ http://lea.verou.me ✿ @leaverou On Jul 25, 2013, at 23:31, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote: > Hi, Lea: Are you talking about where it lists the values: > > Values > > 20px 40px > Any standard CSS... > > Yes, I agree: <length> is better than some arbitrary example value. > > J > > ---------------------------- > julee@adobe.com > @adobejulee > > > > > > From: Lea Verou <lea@w3.org> > Date: Thursday, July 25, 2013 1:25 PM > To: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org> > Subject: Values of CSS properties > > > I see this pattern in many CSS properties. For example, > http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/background-positionSome > have generic data types as values (e.g. length), others try to use > specific examples. > What’s the correct way? > Personally, I think specific examples can be confusing, since the reader > needs to extrapolate the general rule. > > Lea Verou > W3C developer relations > http://w3.org/people/all#lea ? http://lea.verou.me ? @leaverou > > > > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 25 July 2013 20:33:14 UTC