- From: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:26:55 +0000
- To: Mike Sierra <letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com>
- Cc: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
All sounds sensible Mike - some great groundwork done here. Chris Mills Opera Software, dev.opera.com W3C Fellow, web education and webplatform.org Author of "Practical CSS3: Develop and Design" (http://goo.gl/AKf9M) On 28 Jan 2013, at 22:24, Mike Sierra <letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com> wrote: > FYI, I went ahead and punched a bunch of content into the css/units > space, which could probably use another category on the top-level CSS > page. I decided not to create a million picayune pages for each > individual unit, so I sliced them up into broad categories. Also > decided to cover various reba() & hsla() values under that tree rather > than under css/functions, where I thought they'd be hard to relate to > each other. And I'm afraid I used the "concepts" template, which may > have been inappropriate. It's all pretty skeletal & straight out of > the spec, so it could use more in the way of examples & other > improvements. > > --Mike Sierra > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Mike Sierra > <letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com> wrote: >>> Thanks for the comments guys! >>> >>> I have answered pretty much all of Mike's comments. I also agreed entirely with PhistucK's comments, and have implemented a page about CSS images at http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/concepts/css-images and referenced it from my CSS property guide (http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:CSS_property_guide). It makes a lot of sense to cover concepts and other info that applies to several properties, in separate pages. >> >> That point is worth stressing as part of the instructions. Authors >> should ask whether information they want to include for this property >> is also appropriate for other properties as well. In that case, link >> to it elsewhere. In general, draw links within the site, even to >> appropriate destinations that don't exist yet. In this case, url() >> and various *-gradient() functions are viable targets within the >> "css/functions" tree. (Either search or navigate to css/functions to >> research existing pages.) Or if you're describing background colors, >> rather than detail how RGBA/HSLA values work, you should point to >> css/units (caveat: that tree doesn't exist yet). If you find yourself >> using any other common jargon that's hard to classify & that readers >> might not be familiar with, create a link within the top-level >> "concepts" tree, e.g., "viewport," "vendor prefixes," or "standards >> mode." Readers may also benefit from links to tutorials on the subject >> available as "CSS learning material." (Other areas such as HTML, >> Javascript, and SVG have their own learning-material areas.) >> >> --Mike Sierra
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 10:27:27 UTC