- From: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 09:01:08 +0000
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
I'm happy to help on this, and what you've suggested so far sounds like a pretty decent structure for the talk. The main thing I would add in, this being a W3C conference, is a bit about where webplatform.org fits in with the rest of the W3C ecosystem as a useful part of the toolkit, and relates to the specs, the validators, the test suites, etc. Chris Mills Opera Software, dev.opera.com W3C Fellow, web education and webplatform.org Author of "Practical CSS3: Develop and Design" (http://goo.gl/AKf9M) On 3 Feb 2013, at 19:33, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: > Hi, folks- > > Janet Swisher and I are doing a joint presentation together at W3Conf, 21-22 February, on Web Platform Docs and community documentation. > > I'll focus on the WPD side of things, while Janet will focus on the broader community documentation aspect. I'd like to finalize our slides this week. > > I'd love to have your thoughts on what we should focus on for the presentation, and even on how we should structure it. My thoughts were that we would open with an explanation on who started it, why we did, what need we saw, then do a little tour of the site, then talk about our areas of current focus (CSS properties and APIs); Janet would then take over and talk about the social aspects of the site, how we’re organized, the pillars and principles, the communication channels, and what the audience can do to help. We would end with a call to action to attend the Doc Sprint the day after the conference. > > I'm open to any clever ideas you have; if you have idea or slides that went over well in Doc Sprints or other events where you've talked about WPD, that would be great. In particular, here are a couple of concrete things I'd be grateful for help with: > > * A "tour path": I'd like to put together a quick tour of the site that is both representative and flattering, that shows off what we have done so far; parts of the site are still rough now, so I'd love to work with some of you to clean up some parts to make them highlight our aspirations > > * Review of the slide deck (once it's more mature) > > Thanks- > -Doug
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 09:01:41 UTC