- From: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:47:33 -0700
- To: Shali Nguyen <shalinguyen@gmail.com>
- Cc: Carlos Araya <carlos.araya@gmail.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHZLcPpkNUD2ybcEy6X2sPLHMXLRzSnPUG840=YBVY+hME32eA@mail.gmail.com>
Muchas gracias, Shali! You rock! ~Scott On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Shali Nguyen <shalinguyen@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for all the helpful notes! I've actually gone through to do an > audit of the column examples and have updated them all to follow the > formatting, cleaning up some examples and moving towards prefix-free with > the note for each. I've also updated the respective section examples to > match these as well. > > http://code.webplatform.org/gist/5305475 - column-width > http://code.webplatform.org/gist/5306158 - column-span > http://code.webplatform.org/gist/6288958 - column-rule-width, > column-rule-style, column-rule-color > http://code.webplatform.org/gist/5305647 - column-gap > http://code.webplatform.org/gist/6393571 - column-fill > http://code.webplatform.org/gist/6288917 - column-count > > -Shali > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> wrote: > >> Clearly I had a great weekend and forgot to come to work today. Thanks >> Carlos! >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Carlos Araya <carlos.araya@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> I think this came only to me :-) >>> >>> Not a problem. Work and training have kept me quiet in the WPD front. >>> I'm sorry about that. >>> >>> Carlos >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks Carlos! As I mentioned earlier in the thread, prefixes are >>>> extremely unpopular. That said, however, they're going to be around for a >>>> while, and citing them in examples is not necessarily a problem, as long as >>>> we do it with the non-prefixed value last, as in the example from the >>>> editing guide (http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:CSS_property_guide >>>> ): >>>> >>>> background-image: -webkit-linear-gradient(top,#aaa,#eee); >>>> background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(top,#aaa,#eee); >>>> background-image: -ms-linear-gradient(top,#aaa,#eee); >>>> background-image: -o-linear-gradient(top,#aaa,#eee); >>>> background-image: linear-gradient(to bottom,#aaa,#eee); >>>> >>>> There are instances where prefixes are just not appropriate, such as >>>> when the property is long-established (most CSS level 1 properties), and >>>> using a prefix is just silly. >>>> >>>> But I'd like to hear what others think about this. Should we include >>>> prefixes in our examples? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Carlos Araya <carlos.araya@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Just my two cents. >>>>> >>>>> If we're documenting the standard we shouldn't give examples that >>>>> don't use what the standard states. >>>>> >>>>> I understand the need to make people aware of what the vendors do with >>>>> prefixes but would much rather encourage people to work with libraries like >>>>> Prefixfree that will make coding to a standard much easier for everyone >>>>> involved. >>>>> >>>>> When I created the examples for columns during the San Francisco >>>>> sprint earlier this year I also raised the issue of using Prefixfree rather >>>>> than code multiple versions of the same code and then have to track when a >>>>> vendor has started supporting the unprefixed version and whether the >>>>> vendor-specific version was still supported. >>>>> >>>>> Carlos >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Shali Nguyen <shalinguyen@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi there! >>>>>> >>>>>> I was going through the webplatform.org docs today and became >>>>>> immediately interested. I've been wanting to find a way to help contribute >>>>>> to the community and would love to lend a hand! >>>>>> >>>>>> I plan on hopping in on tomorrow morning's meeting but wanted to try >>>>>> and get started to see if I could be of help. Upon reviewing "columns" >>>>>> article from the Aug 14th week, it looks like you guys are missing some >>>>>> examples and have some that exist that aren't formatted cross browser >>>>>> w/vendor prefixes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Here are my suggested improvements on live examples for Multi-column >>>>>> sections: >>>>>> >>>>>> *http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/columns >>>>>> *Currently has no live example. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Existing example: None >>>>>> - New example: http://code.webplatform.org/gist/6288803 >>>>>> >>>>>> *http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/column-count >>>>>> *Existing live example doesn't show column-count. I've created a >>>>>> simpler example for only the column-count property. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Existing example: http://code.webplatform.org/gist/5305530 >>>>>> - New example: http://code.webplatform.org/gist/6288917 >>>>>> >>>>>> *http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/column-rule >>>>>> *Currently has no live example. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Existing example: None >>>>>> - New example: http://code.webplatform.org/gist/6288958 >>>>>> >>>>>> *http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/column-rule-color >>>>>> *Currently has no live example. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Existing example: None >>>>>> - Propose to use this existing example: >>>>>> http://code.webplatform.org/gist/6288958 (same column-rule above) >>>>>> >>>>>> *http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/column-rule-width >>>>>> *Uses jsfiddle example instead of codelet. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Existing example: http://jsfiddle.net/dstorey/K6X54/ >>>>>> - Propose to use this existing example: >>>>>> http://code.webplatform.org/gist/6288958 (same column-rule above) >>>>>> >>>>>> *http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/column-rule-style >>>>>> *Uses an example only visible in firefox. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Existing example: http://code.webplatform.org/gist/5305898 >>>>>> - Propose to use this existing example: >>>>>> http://code.webplatform.org/gist/6288958 (same column-rule above) >>>>>> >>>>>> It looks like *column-fill *and *column-gap* examples are fine >>>>>> unless we want to make sure vendor prefixes are also included. If that's >>>>>> the case, here is the updated example (forked from existing example): >>>>>> http://code.webplatform.org/gist/6289096<http://code.webplatform..org/gist/6289096> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Shali Nguyen >>>>>> www.shalinguyen.com >>>>>> follow me @shalinguyen >>>>>> AIM: shalinguyen >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > > > -- > Shali Nguyen > www.shalinguyen.com > follow me @shalinguyen > AIM: shalinguyen >
Received on Friday, 30 August 2013 21:48:00 UTC