- From: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 11:21:47 -0700
- To: Carlos Araya <carlos.araya@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHZLcPrMi8NMc0RmYOZnp_QsbhGwBUNB1UQ7fCqg=ECk51TRHA@mail.gmail.com>
Clearly I had a great weekend and forgot to come to work today. Thanks Carlos! On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Carlos Araya <carlos.araya@gmail.com>wrote: > I think this came only to me :-) > > Not a problem. Work and training have kept me quiet in the WPD front. > I'm sorry about that. > > Carlos > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> wrote: > >> Thanks Carlos! As I mentioned earlier in the thread, prefixes are >> extremely unpopular. That said, however, they're going to be around for a >> while, and citing them in examples is not necessarily a problem, as long as >> we do it with the non-prefixed value last, as in the example from the >> editing guide (http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:CSS_property_guide): >> >> background-image: -webkit-linear-gradient(top,#aaa,#eee); >> background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(top,#aaa,#eee); >> background-image: -ms-linear-gradient(top,#aaa,#eee); >> background-image: -o-linear-gradient(top,#aaa,#eee); >> background-image: linear-gradient(to bottom,#aaa,#eee); >> >> There are instances where prefixes are just not appropriate, such as when >> the property is long-established (most CSS level 1 properties), and using a >> prefix is just silly. >> >> But I'd like to hear what others think about this. Should we include >> prefixes in our examples? >> >> >> >> On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Carlos Araya <carlos.araya@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Just my two cents. >>> >>> If we're documenting the standard we shouldn't give examples that don't >>> use what the standard states. >>> >>> I understand the need to make people aware of what the vendors do with >>> prefixes but would much rather encourage people to work with libraries like >>> Prefixfree that will make coding to a standard much easier for everyone >>> involved. >>> >>> When I created the examples for columns during the San Francisco sprint >>> earlier this year I also raised the issue of using Prefixfree rather than >>> code multiple versions of the same code and then have to track when a >>> vendor has started supporting the unprefixed version and whether the >>> vendor-specific version was still supported. >>> >>> Carlos >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Shali Nguyen <shalinguyen@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi there! >>>> >>>> I was going through the webplatform.org docs today and became >>>> immediately interested. I've been wanting to find a way to help contribute >>>> to the community and would love to lend a hand! >>>> >>>> I plan on hopping in on tomorrow morning's meeting but wanted to try >>>> and get started to see if I could be of help. Upon reviewing "columns" >>>> article from the Aug 14th week, it looks like you guys are missing some >>>> examples and have some that exist that aren't formatted cross browser >>>> w/vendor prefixes. >>>> >>>> Here are my suggested improvements on live examples for Multi-column >>>> sections: >>>> >>>> *http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/columns >>>> *Currently has no live example. >>>> >>>> - Existing example: None >>>> - New example: http://code.webplatform.org/gist/6288803 >>>> >>>> *http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/column-count >>>> *Existing live example doesn't show column-count. I've created a >>>> simpler example for only the column-count property. >>>> >>>> - Existing example: http://code.webplatform.org/gist/5305530 >>>> - New example: http://code.webplatform.org/gist/6288917 >>>> >>>> *http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/column-rule >>>> *Currently has no live example. >>>> >>>> - Existing example: None >>>> - New example: http://code.webplatform.org/gist/6288958 >>>> >>>> *http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/column-rule-color >>>> *Currently has no live example. >>>> >>>> - Existing example: None >>>> - Propose to use this existing example: >>>> http://code.webplatform.org/gist/6288958 (same column-rule above) >>>> >>>> *http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/column-rule-width >>>> *Uses jsfiddle example instead of codelet. >>>> >>>> - Existing example: http://jsfiddle.net/dstorey/K6X54/ >>>> - Propose to use this existing example: >>>> http://code.webplatform.org/gist/6288958 (same column-rule above) >>>> >>>> *http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/column-rule-style >>>> *Uses an example only visible in firefox. >>>> >>>> - Existing example: http://code.webplatform.org/gist/5305898 >>>> - Propose to use this existing example: >>>> http://code.webplatform.org/gist/6288958 (same column-rule above) >>>> >>>> It looks like *column-fill *and *column-gap* examples are fine unless >>>> we want to make sure vendor prefixes are also included. If that's the case, >>>> here is the updated example (forked from existing example): >>>> http://code.webplatform.org/gist/6289096<http://code.webplatform..org/gist/6289096> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Shali Nguyen >>>> www.shalinguyen.com >>>> follow me @shalinguyen >>>> AIM: shalinguyen >>>> >>> >>> >> >
Received on Monday, 26 August 2013 18:22:15 UTC