- From: Sébastien Desbenoit <seb@desbenoit.net>
- Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 21:08:58 +0100
- To: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
- Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <D21772E2-5F35-491A-B8E8-82F51EE70BBC@desbenoit.net>
Wow Chris, neat work! I'm working on the icons right now, but I may have a list of all the icons I need to draw? Best, Seb Le 7 déc. 2012 à 17:24, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com> a écrit : > Hey all, > > I have refined the design of the new landing pages a bit, and created a couple more. See > > http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/TEST:main_page > > http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/TEST:html > http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/TEST:css > http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/TEST:general_concepts > > People seemed to quite like where this was going, so let's go forward with it, shall we? > > As far as I see it, I need: > > * Some icons from Seb (I know he's working on it, so cool) > * Some actual proper design work plus adding the styles to the WP CSS (I'm guessing Lea needs to do this) > * A template/form guru to create a new template for the topics layout? > > Chris Mills > Open standards evangelist and dev.opera.com editor, Opera Software > Co-chair, web education community group, W3C > Author of "Practical CSS3: Develop and Design" (http://my.opera.com/chrismills/blog/2012/07/12/practical-css3-my-book-is-finally-published) > > * Try Opera: http://www.opera.com > * Learn about the latest open standards technologies and techniques: http://dev.opera.com > * Contribute to web education: http://www.w3.org/community/webed/ > > On 6 Dec 2012, at 11:36, Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com> wrote: > >> >> On 6 Dec 2012, at 01:42, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote: >> >>> Great! (Thought we weren't supposed to use HTML, but definitely a great >>> improvement.) >> >> Yeah, that's just for the mockup. For the final thing, this would be handled by a form/template, I suspect. >> >>> >>> Wish we could make the Summary section go away. Or move it - below? >> >> We should certainly get rid of the "Summary" heading, imo. It is fairly obvious that it's a summary of the page. Maybe we could just give the summary text in each case another implicit visual aid, such as a slightly darker background or something? >> >>> >>> Having the real map of what's available above the fold might help people >>> move faster to their desired destinations. >> >> I still think the summary and other short intro gubbins should go before the topic list - this just makes more sense in terms of the structure. Or do you think it would still work with the topics first? what do you think of these now? >> >> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/TEST:main_page >> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/TEST:html >> >> ? >> >> And also, the concept of "above the fold" is becoming increasingly less relevant now people are using such a wide variety of screen sizes to view the web (I never liked it being applied to the web in the first place, but I know what you mean). People on mobile and smaller tablet screen sizes would not benefit from the topic map being "above the fold" anyway. > > -- Sébastien Desbenoit twitter : @desbenoit site : http://desbenoit.net blog : http://internetetmoi.fr mobile : +33 (0)6 98 54 92 93
Received on Friday, 7 December 2012 20:09:33 UTC