- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 21:28:20 -0400
- To: Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca>, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- CC: public-webpaymentsigcharter <public-webpaymentsigcharter@w3.org>, Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
On 09/01/2014 12:30 PM, Joseph Potvin wrote: > RE: Doesn’t fiat imply government? > > If what's intended in that section of the Charter is to say > "stateless currencies", then some variant of this phrase would be > better. But would "Berkshares" that (I think) involve a regional > government and some municipalites in Massachussetts be inside our > outside that concept? http://www.berkshares.org/community_industry +1 to removing non-fiat. Perhaps changing it to "private currencies"? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_currency -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2014 01:28:51 UTC