- From: Arthur Britto <ahbritto@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 23:22:00 -0800
- To: Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com>
- Cc: Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca>, Evan Schwartz <evan@ripple.com>, "Reutzel, Bailey" <bailey.reutzel@sourcemedia.com>, Jeffrey Cliff <jeffrey.cliff@gmail.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFjXj6OWi4UtvFKATo8Hnnq_kOxT9=0qjG8UQWoc1is1kf0wkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Ripple Labs explains the Ripple network and XRP here: https://ripple.com/ripple_primer.pdf -Arthur On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com>wrote: > Joseph, > > Thanks for your clarification. I believe I was in error, and what you say > gives a bit more clarity. It appears to be a complicated subject. I > searched for virtual commodities and found them to be in context of an > internet game (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_economy). I found > Bitcoins referred to as virtual tokens here: ( > http://www.bellenews.com/2014/01/06/science-tech/how-bitcoin-works/). > > -Brent > > -Brent > > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca> wrote: > >> RE: Actually, Joseph Potvin reminded me of something. Bitcoin and XRP are >> "virtual currencies" >> >> I like to clarify. Their status as currencies is in the eyes of the >> (be)holders. Government analysts in both China and Finland (at least, >> perhaps others more recently) have determined that these are virtual >> commodities, and expressly NOT virtual currencies. This distinction is >> important because very different laws come into play. >> >> The term I prefer is: Bitcoin and XRP are "virtual tokens" (...although >> the hype sometimes makes them seem more like "virtual totems"). >> >> Joseph Potvin >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Brent Shambaugh < >> brent.shambaugh@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Here is what I am gathering: >>> >>> In the original Ripple, Money was an IOU. (1) >>> >>> When currency unit XRP was introduced, it prevented transaction and >>> ledger spam and acted as a bridge currency. (2) >>> >>> If I can recall correctly, XRP was an attempted to solve problems with >>> the former. Supposedly these problems are those mentioned for (2). >>> >>> Actually, Joseph Potvin reminded me of something. Bitcoin and XRP are >>> "virtual currencies" >>> >>> I would be interested to know more about the free riders. Were they >>> people in the network who were untrustworthy to transfer IOUs? Were they a >>> reason for the creation of XRP? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Brent >>> >>> (1) Ryan Fugger, Money as IOUs in Social Trust Networks & A Proposal for >>> a Decentralized Currency Protocol, April 18th, 2004, >>> http://archive.ripple-project.org/decentralizedcurrency.pdf >>> (2) Ripple credits, Ripple Wiki, https://ripple.com/wiki/XRP >>> (3) Application of FinCEN's Regulations to Persons Administering, >>> Exchanging, or Using Virtual Currencies, >>> http://fincen.gov/statutes_regs/guidance/html/FIN-2013-G001.html >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Evan Schwartz <evan@ripple.com> wrote: >>> >>>> If anyone has questions about how Ripple works or what it brings to web >>>> payments, I'd be more than happy to try to take a stab at answering them. >>>> >>>> The distinction between Ripple the network and Ripple the currency is >>>> often quite confusing so I think it's most helpful to call the network >>>> Ripple and the currency just XRP. >>>> >>>> Evan >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Reutzel, Bailey < >>>> bailey.reutzel@sourcemedia.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The first iteration of Ripple was conceived by Ryan Fugger in 2004 >>>>> yes, but that was littered with free riders that never fulfilled their >>>>> orders. So he started working on a way to mitigate this. >>>>> But in my opinion Chris Larsen, a serial financial services disruptor >>>>> whose company now controls Ripple, began to build it out and push it to the >>>>> mainstream because he saw the attention Bitcoin was receiving. I think >>>>> Larsen pushed this as a cryptocurrency to catch attention, because the >>>>> platform itself is not really about cryptocurrency at all. >>>>> >>>>> Sorry I should have explained further. >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Jeffrey Cliff [mailto:jeffrey.cliff@gmail.com] >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 12:53 PM >>>>> To: Reutzel, Bailey >>>>> Cc: Brent Shambaugh; Joseph Potvin; Manu Sporny; Web Payments CG >>>>> Subject: Re: Web Payments Workshop position paper submitted >>>>> >>>>> > Basically Ripple was created a math-based currency to try and catch >>>>> > some of the hype. >>>>> >>>>> Not true. Ripple predates bitcoin, and the hype that followed. >>>>> >>>>> On 04/02/2014, Reutzel, Bailey <bailey.reutzel@sourcemedia.com> wrote: >>>>> > .. XRP is used as a way to eliminate fraud on the network. >>>>> > Basically consumers using the Ripple platform must send a transaction >>>>> > fee in XRP when they make a payment, even if they're sending U.S. >>>>> > dollars to someone that only accepts Euros. Ripple finds that >>>>> > intermediary to send the payment through... so a node that accepts US >>>>> > dollars and will send the end party Euros. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > From: Reutzel, Bailey [mailto:bailey.reutzel@sourcemedia.com] >>>>> > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 11:48 AM >>>>> > To: Brent Shambaugh; Joseph Potvin >>>>> > Cc: Manu Sporny; Web Payments CG >>>>> > Subject: RE: Web Payments Workshop position paper submitted >>>>> > >>>>> > Yes they call the currency Ripple or XRP. >>>>> > >>>>> > From: Brent Shambaugh [mailto:brent.shambaugh@gmail.com] >>>>> > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 11:46 AM >>>>> > To: Joseph Potvin >>>>> > Cc: Manu Sporny; Web Payments CG >>>>> > Subject: Re: Web Payments Workshop position paper submitted >>>>> > >>>>> > Is Ripple really a currency? I thought XRP was. >>>>> > >>>>> > https://ripple.com/currency/ >>>>> > I just performed a Google search. Perhaps some clarification here? >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Joseph Potvin >>>>> > <jpotvin@opman.ca<mailto:jpotvin@opman.ca>> wrote: >>>>> > Just noticed... the phrase "open, patent and royalty-free standard" >>>>> > snuck back in. It should be "through open methods, unencumbered by >>>>> > patents or royalties" >>>>> > (this phrasing allows for defensive patents) >>>>> > >>>>> > joseph >>>>> > >>>>> > On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Manu Sporny >>>>> > <msporny@digitalbazaar.com<mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>> wrote: >>>>> > The Web Payments Workshop position paper has been submitted. The copy >>>>> > that was submitted is attached. A rough HTML version of the document >>>>> > is available here: >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> https://web-payments.org/papers/2014/WebPaymentsWorkshopPositionPaper/ >>>>> > >>>>> > If there are errors or omissions, we have a week to correct them. >>>>> > >>>>> > -- manu >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) >>>>> > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. >>>>> > blog: The Worlds First Web Payments Workshop >>>>> > http://www.w3.org/2013/10/payments/ >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > Joseph Potvin >>>>> > Operations Manager | Gestionnaire des opérations The Opman Company | >>>>> > La compagnie Opman >>>>> > http://www.projectmanagementhotel.com/projects/opman-portfolio >>>>> > jpotvin@opman.ca<mailto:jpotvin@opman.ca> >>>>> > Mobile: 819-593-5983<tel:819-593-5983> LinkedIn (Google short URL): >>>>> > http://goo.gl/Ssp56 >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > "This communication is intended solely for the addressee and is >>>>> > confidential and not for third party unauthorized distribution" >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on >>>>> any forum and add 1 to the generation >>>>> >>>>> "This communication is intended solely for the addressee and is >>>>> confidential and not for third party unauthorized distribution" >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Evan Schwartz >>>> Developer + Technology Pioneer >>>> Ripple Labs Inc. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Joseph Potvin >> Operations Manager | Gestionnaire des opérations >> The Opman Company | La compagnie Opman >> http://www.projectmanagementhotel.com/projects/opman-portfolio >> jpotvin@opman.ca >> Mobile: 819-593-5983 >> >> LinkedIn (Google short URL): http://goo.gl/Ssp56 >> > >
Received on Saturday, 8 February 2014 07:22:30 UTC