- From: Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca>
- Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 07:52:03 -0400
- To: pindar wong <pindar.wong@gmail.com>
- Cc: Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
RE: "Not a technical issue" These issues are technical in law. They set some of the business requirements for the application layer. There will be battles about these business requirements because they really matter. Joseph Potvin On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 10:14 PM, pindar wong <pindar.wong@gmail.com> wrote: > consensus by exhaustion. > > Not a technical issue, but I wonder what other 'civil code'-base might be > worth exploring...perhaps something in the EU/Asia? > > p. > > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca> wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >> Our concerns need to extend beyond what might actually be contrary to >> existing laws/regulation, to include what may simply be >> perceived/portrayed to be so even if technically sound. In general, >> one needs to assume that well-funded yet frivolous and/or vexatious >> legal challenges can be extremely "successful" when the complaintant's >> objective is just to waste the target's resources for a decade, never >> to actually "win" in the end on substantive merit. > > > [snip] >
Received on Monday, 9 September 2013 11:52:49 UTC