- From: pindar wong <pindar.wong@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 10:14:29 +0800
- To: Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca>
- Cc: Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 9 September 2013 02:14:56 UTC
consensus by exhaustion. Not a technical issue, but I wonder what other 'civil code'-base might be worth exploring...perhaps something in the EU/Asia? p. On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca> wrote: > [snip] > > Our concerns need to extend beyond what might actually be contrary to > existing laws/regulation, to include what may simply be > perceived/portrayed to be so even if technically sound. In general, > one needs to assume that well-funded yet frivolous and/or vexatious > legal challenges can be extremely "successful" when the complaintant's > objective is just to waste the target's resources for a decade, never > to actually "win" in the end on substantive merit. > [snip]
Received on Monday, 9 September 2013 02:14:56 UTC