public-webpayments-specs@w3.org from December 2019 by author

crowgames

• [w3c/payment-request] Clarification: onshippingaddresschange in case of autofill/pre-filled fields (#887) (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Prevent double spending through retry (#882) (Wednesday, 4 December)

Danyao Wang

• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Open Window Algorithm and tracking through 1ps (#351) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Open Window Algorithm and tracking through 1ps (#351) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Open Window Algorithm and tracking through 1ps (#351) (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Open Window Algorithm and tracking through 1ps (#351) (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Open Window Algorithm and tracking through 1ps (#351) (Tuesday, 10 December)

Domenic Denicola

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Friday, 6 December)

ianbjacobs

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: add informative changelog (#884) (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] broken links in definitions of attributes of PaymentRequestEvent (#355) (Monday, 2 December)

Jeffrey Yasskin

• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Open Window Algorithm and tracking through 1ps (#351) (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Open Window Algorithm and tracking through 1ps (#351) (Thursday, 12 December)

Jim

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Ship Mode Update for PO BOX (#888) (Tuesday, 10 December)
• [w3c/payment-request] Ship Mode Update for PO BOX (#888) (Tuesday, 10 December)

Justin

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Should show() consume user activation? (#886) (Tuesday, 10 December)

k2snowman69

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Use Case: 3DS 1.0 flows and invoking PR API from inside an iFrame (#881) (Monday, 23 December)

Krystian Czesak

• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] add requestSecurityCode member to BasicCardRequest (#78) (Tuesday, 3 December)

Marcos Cáceres

• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Dependencies section no longer needed (#83) (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] The "triggered by user activation" link is incorrect (#358) (Tuesday, 24 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Ship Mode Update for PO BOX (#888) (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Updated examples.md - Formatting (#357) (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Updated examples.md - Formatting (#357) (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Updated examples.md - Formatting (#357) (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Allow incremental request of billing and shipping address (#873) (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] chore: Prepare PR branch (#860) (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] chore: Prepare PR branch (#860) (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Rephrase "triggered by user activation" to match the new user activation model (#883) (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Should show() consume user activation? (#886) (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Should show() consume user activation? (#886) (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Should show() consume user activation? (#886) (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Tuesday, 10 December)
• [w3c/payment-request] Should show() consume user activation? (#886) (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: add informative changelog (#884) (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Friday, 6 December)
• [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Friday, 6 December)
• [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: add informative changelog (#884) (Friday, 6 December)

MaxG

• [w3c/payment-handler] The "triggered by user activation" link is incorrect (#358) (Monday, 23 December)

MikeD123

• [w3c/payment-handler] Updated examples.md - Formatting (#357) (Saturday, 21 December)

Mustaq Ahmed

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: use new user activation model (#885) (Friday, 6 December)
• [w3c/payment-request] Rephrase "triggered by user activation" to match the new user activation model (#883) (Thursday, 5 December)

pes

• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Open Window Algorithm and tracking through 1ps (#351) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Open Window Algorithm and tracking through 1ps (#351) (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Open Window Algorithm and tracking through 1ps (#351) (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] Open Window Algorithm and tracking through 1ps (#351) (Tuesday, 10 December)

Rouslan Solomakhin

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Ship Mode Update for PO BOX (#888) (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Should show() consume user activation? (#886) (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Clarification: onshippingaddresschange in case of autofill/pre-filled fields (#887) (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Clarification: onshippingaddresschange in case of autofill/pre-filled fields (#887) (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Clarification: onshippingaddresschange in case of autofill/pre-filled fields (#887) (Monday, 9 December)

Last message date: Saturday, 28 December 2019 04:23:49 UTC