public-webont-comments@w3.org from September 2002 by thread

Forwarding comments from Bobrow at Parc [Fwd: Support for OWL-lite and full OWL] Deborah McGuinness (Thursday, 19 September)

• named cardinalities [was: Forwarding comments from Bobrow at Parc ] Dan Connolly (Friday, 20 September)

Relationship between OWL and DAML+OIL Uschold, Michael F (Tuesday, 10 September)

• Re: Relationship between OWL and DAML+OIL Jim Hendler (Wednesday, 11 September)
• RE: Relationship between OWL and DAML+OIL Uschold, Michael F (Wednesday, 11 September)
  • Re: Relationship between OWL and DAML+OIL Mike Dean (Wednesday, 11 September)

comments on abstract syntax for OWL (Lite) Carlo Wouters (Monday, 9 September)

• Re: comments on abstract syntax for OWL (Lite) Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Monday, 9 September)

OWL working drafts - feedback Emery, Pat (Friday, 6 September)

• Re: OWL working drafts - feedback Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Saturday, 7 September)
• RE: OWL working drafts - feedback Emery, Pat (Monday, 9 September)
  • Re: OWL working drafts - feedback Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Monday, 9 September)
• RE: OWL working drafts - feedback Emery, Pat (Monday, 9 September)

Feature synopsis: form comments Jerome Euzenat (Wednesday, 4 September)

Feature synopsis: content comments Jerome Euzenat (Wednesday, 4 September)

• Re: Feature synopsis: content comments (named cardinalities) Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 4 September)

Feature synopsis: misc comments Jerome Euzenat (Wednesday, 4 September)

• Re: Feature synopsis: misc comments Frank van Harmelen (Monday, 23 September)

Comments on the OWL-Lite draft Bob MacGregor (Tuesday, 3 September)

• Re: Comments on the OWL-Lite draft Jim Hendler (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Re: Comments on the OWL-Lite draft Deborah McGuinness (Thursday, 5 September)

Last message date: Monday, 23 September 2002 16:42:31 UTC