- From: Jerome Euzenat <Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr>
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 10:43:15 +0200
- To: public-webont-comments@w3.org
- Cc: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>, dlm@KSL.Stanford.EDU
Dear all,
I separate that one because I am sure it is controversial and
subject to interpretation:
3.6, imports: "a URI specifying from where the ontology is to be imported from"
I still understand that a URI is supposed to identify and not to
locate so it does not denote a location but a thing (e.g., isbn:...,
doi:..., etc.). So, in my opinion this should be an URL.
This is just the opinion of a layman.
--
Jérôme Euzenat __
/ /\
INRIA Rhône-Alpes, _/ _ _ _ _ _
/_) | ` / ) | \ \ /_)
655, avenue de l'Europe, (___/___(_/_/ / /_(_________________
Montbonnot St Martin, / http://www.inrialpes.fr/exmo
38334 Saint-Ismier cedex, / Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr
France____________________/ Jerome.Euzenat@free.fr
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2002 04:51:53 UTC