public-webont-comments@w3.org from September 2002 by author

Bob MacGregor

• Comments on the OWL-Lite draft (Tuesday, 3 September)

Carlo Wouters

• comments on abstract syntax for OWL (Lite) (Monday, 9 September)

Dan Connolly

• named cardinalities [was: Forwarding comments from Bobrow at Parc ] (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: Feature synopsis: content comments (named cardinalities) (Wednesday, 4 September)

Deborah McGuinness

• Forwarding comments from Bobrow at Parc [Fwd: Support for OWL-lite and full OWL] (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: Comments on the OWL-Lite draft (Thursday, 5 September)

Emery, Pat

• RE: OWL working drafts - feedback (Monday, 9 September)
• RE: OWL working drafts - feedback (Monday, 9 September)
• OWL working drafts - feedback (Friday, 6 September)

Frank van Harmelen

• Re: Feature synopsis: misc comments (Monday, 23 September)

Jerome Euzenat

• Feature synopsis: form comments (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Feature synopsis: content comments (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Feature synopsis: misc comments (Wednesday, 4 September)

Jim Hendler

• Re: Relationship between OWL and DAML+OIL (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: Comments on the OWL-Lite draft (Wednesday, 4 September)

Mike Dean

• Re: Relationship between OWL and DAML+OIL (Wednesday, 11 September)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: comments on abstract syntax for OWL (Lite) (Monday, 9 September)
• Re: OWL working drafts - feedback (Monday, 9 September)
• Re: OWL working drafts - feedback (Saturday, 7 September)

Uschold, Michael F

• RE: Relationship between OWL and DAML+OIL (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Relationship between OWL and DAML+OIL (Tuesday, 10 September)

Last message date: Monday, 23 September 2002 16:42:31 UTC