Re: Proposal: creation of a WebID json-ld context, as a CG work item

+1

See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2022Jan/0055.html

On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 2:46 PM Nathan Rixham <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:

> +1, it factors the arguing over semantics side away from the simple but
> critical bit which is consumed to make systems work
>
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 4:30 PM Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> This proposal is simply whether to create a JSON-LD context for WebIDs
>>
>> This suggestion brought up here:
>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2022Jan/0012.html
>>
>> The use case would be that it could be used in examples helping
>> publishers deploy WebIDs more easily
>>
>> This thread is not primarily about how, or where that should be done.
>> Just whether or not it should be a work item
>>
>> I think it's fairly uncontroversial, but feel free to ACK / NACK / comment
>>
>