- From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 20:25:24 +0100
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Sebastian Hellmann <hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
Wow this exploded fast. I still haven't seen any justification as to why a specific serialization should be mandated, or why it should be JSON-LD. Of course have WebID and Linked Data to do with content negotiation, as they are a subset of the WWW. If some software does only read JSON and cannot negotiate multiple RDF formats, then fix that software. Conneg is managed automatically if one is using a proper HTTP/REST framework. The only complaint I can identify with on this thread is the browser UI for the client certificates. We have worked around it by deploying two webapp instances -- one read-only on port 443 that does not prompt for client certs, and another read-write on a different port that does. I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for browser vendors to improve this. But that is a shortcoming of the browsers, and not of the WebID protocol. Martynas atomgraph.com On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 3:55 PM Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 at 14:50, Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> wrote: >> >> Quoting Melvin Carvalho (2022-01-22 14:28:53) >> > On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 at 13:22, Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> wrote: >> > >> > > Quoting Melvin Carvalho (2022-01-22 10:49:18) >> > > > schema.org is the most well deployed form of linked data on the >> > > > web. It's a de-facto standard. >> > > >> > > So should we *mandate* schema.org? I say at most *recommend* it. >> > > >> > > By saying that, I do not mean to downplay the importance of >> > > schema.org, only leave room for usecases where it is irrelevant and >> > > therefore would be a burden if *mandated*. >> > > >> > >> > It's natural for most technologies to see how they get deployed in the >> > wild and adjust to that >> > >> > So, I'd say rather, learn from the deployment pattern, and use it as >> > an inspiration >> > >> > The actual vocabs used (e.g. schema, foaf, vcard, as, others), would >> > be a group decision and go into the jsonld context, should we choose >> > to make one >> >> So you *don't* think we should *mandate* schema.org. >> >> Thanks for clarifying. > > > No, I dont have a strong view on one particular vocab over another > > I think JSON(-LD) should be mandated, which would I think warrant a major version upgrade > > What form that JSON takes, I'm very open to. It should be documented and, hopefully, easy to deploy tho. The use case of dropping a webid into github.io resonates with me, which is something that is impractical to do today > >> >> >> - Jonas >> >> -- >> * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt >> * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ >> >> [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Received on Saturday, 22 January 2022 19:25:50 UTC