On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 at 14:50, Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> wrote:
> Quoting Melvin Carvalho (2022-01-22 14:28:53)
> > On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 at 13:22, Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> wrote:
> >
> > > Quoting Melvin Carvalho (2022-01-22 10:49:18)
> > > > schema.org is the most well deployed form of linked data on the
> > > > web. It's a de-facto standard.
> > >
> > > So should we *mandate* schema.org? I say at most *recommend* it.
> > >
> > > By saying that, I do not mean to downplay the importance of
> > > schema.org, only leave room for usecases where it is irrelevant and
> > > therefore would be a burden if *mandated*.
> > >
> >
> > It's natural for most technologies to see how they get deployed in the
> > wild and adjust to that
> >
> > So, I'd say rather, learn from the deployment pattern, and use it as
> > an inspiration
> >
> > The actual vocabs used (e.g. schema, foaf, vcard, as, others), would
> > be a group decision and go into the jsonld context, should we choose
> > to make one
>
> So you *don't* think we should *mandate* schema.org.
>
> Thanks for clarifying.
>
No, I dont have a strong view on one particular vocab over another
I think JSON(-LD) should be mandated, which would I think warrant a major
version upgrade
What form that JSON takes, I'm very open to. It should be documented and,
hopefully, easy to deploy tho. The use case of dropping a webid into
github.io resonates with me, which is something that is impractical to do
today
>
> - Jonas
>
> --
> * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
> * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
>
> [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private