On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 at 14:50, Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> wrote: > Quoting Melvin Carvalho (2022-01-22 14:28:53) > > On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 at 13:22, Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> wrote: > > > > > Quoting Melvin Carvalho (2022-01-22 10:49:18) > > > > schema.org is the most well deployed form of linked data on the > > > > web. It's a de-facto standard. > > > > > > So should we *mandate* schema.org? I say at most *recommend* it. > > > > > > By saying that, I do not mean to downplay the importance of > > > schema.org, only leave room for usecases where it is irrelevant and > > > therefore would be a burden if *mandated*. > > > > > > > It's natural for most technologies to see how they get deployed in the > > wild and adjust to that > > > > So, I'd say rather, learn from the deployment pattern, and use it as > > an inspiration > > > > The actual vocabs used (e.g. schema, foaf, vcard, as, others), would > > be a group decision and go into the jsonld context, should we choose > > to make one > > So you *don't* think we should *mandate* schema.org. > > Thanks for clarifying. > No, I dont have a strong view on one particular vocab over another I think JSON(-LD) should be mandated, which would I think warrant a major version upgrade What form that JSON takes, I'm very open to. It should be documented and, hopefully, easy to deploy tho. The use case of dropping a webid into github.io resonates with me, which is something that is impractical to do today > > - Jonas > > -- > * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt > * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ > > [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Received on Saturday, 22 January 2022 14:55:45 UTC