- From: Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:50:16 +0100
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <164277301635.312615.4456892288333479904@auryn.jones.dk>
Quoting Melvin Carvalho (2022-01-21 13:18:54) > There was a thread in August 2021 regarding the webid default > serialisation, that seems to have stalled, in the github area For reference that's https://github.com/w3c/WebID/issues/3 > 1. Has a default serialization (MUST in the spec) -- this can be a > point of debate > 2. What the default serialization should be for future versions > > I call for a major version upgrade so that existing implementations > can continue to work, and because there are potential breaking changes > > Given that (2) follows from (1) it would be good to solve (2) and get > the opinion of the group > > What is view of the group on what should be the default serialization > of a webid? > > My vote: JSON(-LD) as default, including structured data islands which > are part of the JSON-LD 1.1 spec At https://github.com/w3c/WebID/issues/3, 3 of the 4 involved agreed to narrow the option space to 3 options - none of them being the one you describe above. The 3 options are those in the Kingsley put in a table here: https://github.com/w3c/WebID/issues/3#issuecomment-898969571 All 3 of us agreed that we preferred option #3 among those options: * For both servers and clients, require nothing, but recommend JSON-LD (and recommend no other serialization formats) Can you be persuaded to say "recommendation" instead of "default"? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Received on Friday, 21 January 2022 13:50:34 UTC