On 07/21/2014 12:39 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>
>
>
> On 21 July 2014 18:29, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com
> <mailto:anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On 2014-07-21 18:23, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>
> On 07/21/2014 12:20 PM, Anders Rundgren wrote:
>
> By pure accident I found this:
> http://www.w3.org/Social/WG
>
> Anders
>
>
>
> It's also being announced on the front page, w3.org
> <http://w3.org>, and in various
> media, today.
>
> -- Sandro
>
>
>
> It doesn't appear that WebID is a part of this effort.
>
> This is somewhat strange because a Social Web without a login
> seems like a moderately clever idea.
>
>
> You need to have a paradigm shift, that webid is nothing to do with
> login. WebID facilitates a huge number of use cases, which get built
> out bit by bit.
>
> For example hetrogeneous friending is something that's trivial to do
> with WebID (just add a hyperlink to your profile with the other
> friend's webid) but very hard to do in many social web systems.
>
> The value of webid is from unexpected reuse, because of the freedom it
> offers.
At the risk of repeating myself [1], I think the WebID work is packaged
all wrong to appeal to a wider audience, like the Social WG
-- Sandro
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2014Jul/0023.html
>
>
> Anders
>
>
Received on Monday, 21 July 2014 16:48:13 UTC